08/07/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I this C°~is~ion with respect to intrinsic suitability of the North 80.~ 411 items are satisfied with respect to the North 80 in the s&me imanner as they are satisfied in the South 70 (e.g., wet land: Pro~ection, erosion and ground water quality) except for the placement of the facility within 1,000 feet of an occupied dwellingl. This requirement, as pointed out in the MPCA Order, does not iredder a site intrinsically unsuitable because adverse effects ~n. !be prevented or mitigated by acquiring the property or by pr°Periy designing {e.g., providing adequate screening) and operating t~e site. (MPCA Order, page 7). The Commission, therefore~· finds,~ that based upon the operational design and development Iplans and the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit ~t~ac~ed hereto, adverse effects of the presence of the North 80 environmental improvement can be prevented and, there- fore, finds~[that the proposed development of approximately 25 acres within!, the North 80, based upon the criteria of the I~CA set forthi!ab~ve, is within an area intrinsically suitable for use as a lan~fili. Iniaddition to the design and engineering to be built into bothi, th~ South 70 and the North 80 as described above, the Applicant will be required to abide by established standards, regulatiOns ~nd ordinances of other governmental agencies. (See Conditiomal Anoka Sol~d 83-3; an~ilMi~ Control ~ Rules. P.rio 3se Permit, Paragraph 1) These include County of Waste Ordinance, Ordinance No. 73-1, .~2-1, 83-2, !nesota Rules 1983, Chapter 7035, Minnesota Pollution Solid and Hazardous Waste Division, Solid Waste r to receiving the appropriate permits from the 19