Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />area. (iMetr~. Council Resolution, Resolution No. 2. A and C.) <br />addition,: u~on completion of landfill activities within three <br />years a~er: ,ithe initiation of such activities, the revegetation <br />and post~cl~sure plan of the site will result in usable and <br />attractive ~pen space. (June 25, 1984 Testimony of Henry Koch <br />and Roge~i Bekres; Plans, Section XlII) <br /> <br /> 20 ~ 'T_~. North 80. The design and construction specifica- <br />tions for t~e land use as a disposal facility in the North 80 <br />incorp'oratesl a reduction of the current landfill slope of three <br />to one tO ~ slope of four to one. This modification in the <br />landfilll PrOfile will result in a softer slope and a more appeal- <br />ing land fO~m. The extension of the landfill structure in the <br />North 80 andiwithin the residential zoning district is consistent <br />with the use!of that area as either agricultural or public parks <br />and playgrounds. Upon completion of landfill activities, within <br />five yea~g a[~fter the initiation of such activities, the revege- <br />tation and ~ost-closure plan of the site for open space will <br />result in a ~sable and attractive open space in the vicinity of <br />the residential areas to the north and west of the Landfill <br />development,i (June 25, 1984 testimony of Henry Koch and Roger <br />Berresl ~lan~, Section XlII.) <br /> <br />that the la <br /> <br />appearance. <br /> <br />ed to a tess <br />conditional <br /> <br />adjacent to <br /> <br />%dfill is unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious i <br />iAlthough industrial uses to the south may be affec <br />er degree than residential uses, some permitted a] <br />~ses adjacent to the South 70 and residential use <br />the North 80 would be adversely affected by th <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />In <br /> <br /> <br />