Laserfiche WebLink
F~na[l~}, ~PCA has asked BFl/Woodl~e and ~he Metropo[t~an <br /> <br /> lnc~di~$ drilling, w~st of ~he lmnd~ill. We r~ques~ed ~bis <br /> wor~i~order ~o ad.ess ~be recent finding <br />~ or~ chemicmls In ~wo privm~e wells wes~ of ~he iron. ill, <br /> alt~u~b BFI/Woodl~e's obli~a~ion ~o under~e ~bis work is <br /> ro~d~in ~be general requirements o~ Par~ I II.A.2. of ~he <br />I ~~q pemi~ on ~be existing facility. We further requested <br /> ~h~:~w~ par~ies ~o submi~ work plans Ior ~hese investigations <br /> by ~r~h R~, ~$8~. The work will probably be done pa~ia!ly <br /> in ~p~a~es, with one s~ep dependen~ <br /> ~he ~r~Vious s~ep. Thus, we do not ye~ know exactly wha~ will <br /> be ~ or wheg. ~en we review ~he work plans, we will lear= <br /> wh'~ portion o~ ~bis work is likely ~o be available in ~e <br /> ~o~ ~s$ in :he ElS. ' <br /> <br />I <br /> ~~A p~mi~s were ~o~ lis~ed in ~be EAW. A~r qu~ll~y <br /> i~al~m~ion and opera,ins petal,s will be required ~or ~he <br />~ ~. got ~he new meth~e Kas control system. Agency rule <br /> ~ ~mquires all ~acili~ies wi~h a fuel B~ninE installation <br /> o~0 ~$B~ per ho~ or more input, b~ninE only ~a~ural gas <br />~ ~o~pp~y ~or-an i~alla~ion and oper~inE pe~i~ from ~he ' <br /> ~'mgDlvision oI Air ~ali~y. The bea~ inpu~ ~or ~he new <br /> ~l~m,~a~ g$ ~B~ or more per bo~ will be above ~he 10 ~B~ <br />~ ~$~,[ as will tbs <br /> R$:[:~ p~r ho~). As such, ~wo pemi~s, an installation and <br /> m~$~m~m~in$ p~ mus~ be obtained Ior ~he new ~lare, while <br />I '~ ~ z*p'~'~ ~ ~' pemi~ m~ be o~ained for ~he existing flare. <br /> ~ p~mi~s will l~i~ ~be uischarEe of odors, p~ic~la~e <br /> ~m~, sulI~ dioxide, mhd limi~ noise levels from ~he me~h~e <br /> cOl[~{~lon system. The impact o~ =he me~hane K~ control <br /> sF$~ should bm evaluated wigb respec~ <br /> is ~hmr r.co~mnded ~hm~ ~he ~easibility <br /> r~e~v~ mhd u~ilizagion (~i~her Ior space beating or small <br />I . 4. F~'~l~.~ve Dus~ V~issions <br /> . ~e~ E~S evaluation of ~he potential for incre~ed dust emissio~ <br /> s~Ul4 consider wind erosion of susceptible surfaces such as <br />~ s~ck~iles, covered l~ill s~faces (prior %o vegetation), <br /> re~uS~ ~rucks and private vehicles, as well as activities <br /> ~ w~king landfill face. Receptors (residences) of dus~ <br /> emiss$ons should be discussed in light of prevailing meteor- <br /> ot~l%al 9at~erus ~hroushout ~he year. Mitigative me,utes <br /> d$~Ou~sed could include vegetating soil stoc~iles (especially <br /> i~Zh$ sou~he~ Dot, ion of ~he landfill), haul road mainten~ce~ <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />