Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Page !T~ve~ , ', <br />MarCh! ~6, [ 1983 <br /> <br /> a~$ f~t~e noise levels (daytime and nighttime) at the com- <br /> m~e~ci~l hullings near the Flying Cloud airport and at resi- <br /> dential areas. The ElS should identify which receptors will <br /> e~er~ieace noise levels in excess of the state noise standards. <br /> Mi~ig~ative measures should be discussed if state noise standar~ <br /> <br /> Mitigation of noise impacts considered in the EIS could <br /> ~de a development moratori~ on lots where the state noise <br /> ~an~ards will be violated and operation of the land~ill <br /> d~i~g daytime hours only. Since the construction of the <br /> ~nd~lll ber~ will likel~ have the greatest (albeit tempora~) <br /> ~is~ impact, it is appropriate for the EIS to address noise <br /> !~paSta and mitigation method~ ~peci~ic to this construction, <br /> curfews on berm construction. <br /> ificl~ding <br /> 6. ~i~g C~.,trols and Cther Lo~al Regulatory Activities' <br /> ~e SIS should mddress existing local zoning controls and <br /> a~is~nce control ordinances which apply to the lan~ill oper- <br /> ~ioSs and might be appropriate for mitigation of enviro~ental <br /> !$paSts. Further, the EIS should evaluate recommended ordi- <br /> a~c~s which should be implemented for this purpose. Such <br /> OSdiSances might include specific noise control progr~s, <br /> g~ae~al nuis~ce ordin~ces, zoning controls to. prevent develop- <br /> ~at[of certain receptor lots, and post-clos~e zoning controls. <br /> <br /> The ~IS should ad,ess potential aggravation o~ existing respi- <br /> ~r~t~y disease as a result of ~ugitive dust. Potential effects <br /> .upo~ and of vector and reservoir organisms (rodents, skunks <br /> v~r~ous insects) should be discussed. <br /> Work ~e~ng Done for Existing Landfill's Amended Permit <br /> The~m~me~ded pe~it issued January 28, 1983, for the existing land, ii <br /> com$~in8 requirements for a series of submittals to the ~CA. A1- <br /> Zho~h ~hese submittals pertain only to the existing landfill and <br /> not(~o ~he exp~sion, some of the in~o~ation in th~ most cerZainl~ <br /> will,he,valuable to the EIS. <br /> The:~e~it's due dates for these submittals may no~ be consistent <br /> wi~h~th4 Metropolit~ Co~cil's deadlines for the first dr~ft <br /> We have ~t~ached copies of the pemit and o~ BFI/Woodlake' <br /> s~y of the permit's due dates. Note that the hydro- <br /> conditions report is not required until May 28; the methan~ <br /> <br />oz age <br />g:eO~gl~ <br /> <br /> <br />