08/07/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

erosiomco$~rol, dust, l~ter, and n~se plans on ~uly 28; closure; uX~Zmace l~d use, and post clos~e monZtorZnE ~lans Re u: r d C m onen~s of an A llca~lon lor ~CA Solid It is n:~ ~le~ whether BFI/Woodl~e s submittals to ~he Metropol!ta~ Co~ci!:~fo~ ~he EIS will be developed to the degree of detail needed for ~n~C$ pe~mt ~o ~he e~ansion. Consequently, it is no~ possi. ble at~hi~ ~e ~o dete~ne if ~he 90 d~y provision In 6 MC~ 3.031:B~l,~wlll apply. ~ ~he ~CA Board is to m~e ~ decision on pe~it ~ss~nce within 90 days ~fter the dete~ination o~ adoqu~cy o~ the~ EISa, ~he pe~ ~pplicmtion m~t be developed concu~ently with ~h~ E~S, ~nd mos~ o~ the ~ppl~c~tlon mus~ be ~vmil~ble ~or ~e- ~CA '~i~l ~equlre BFI/Woodl~e's pe~t applics~ion Zo con~n es- sen~i~l!y ~he s~e work elements ~nd level o~ detail as we h,ve requi~ i~ ~he J~nu~y 28 ~endod pe~t for the existing l~d~il!. Some o~f~ e~sting l~ill's pe~t requirements call ~or the ev~lu~on~of impacts from ~he l~ill; for ~hese ite~, BFI/Wood!~ shoUl~ ~os~ logically develop ~n i~acZ ~ssessment for ~he concu~n~ly wi2h ~he i~c~ s~udy ~hey ~re doing for the existing sl~e. ~h~s ~ssessmen2 should s~ with the i~mc~s from t~ ex- isting ~i~l, then use the s~e metho~ to dete~ine the ad~itiOn~! lmpac~S~ ~om the e~slon. ~e potential problem with ~s ~p- pro~c~ ~:is~again ~he existing pekin's due da~es. ~e existing sl~e ~t ~nalysis, the s~ing point for e~ansion imp~c~ evml~o~, does not h~ve ~o be submi2~ed to the ~CA un~il M~y 28. ~or ~ le~t ~wo re~ons, the 90 day requirement for ~ decision Pe~ :~ls~ce could be dif~icult for ~CA. First, o~ pe~it ~ft!~g,~30 day cogent period, pe~it revisions, prep~stion a BO~d l~em', ~nd ~d decision would cons~e the lion's shoe ~he 95~d~ period, leaving lit~le t~e for staf~ review and possi- ble re~ub~ittal o~ s~e it~ by the ~pplicant. Second, we are uncer~in ~when we will h~ve a pe~ ~pplication ~hat we reg~d "co~!~e~'' since we do not know either ~he level of detail o~ ~he submit]~l$~ . BFI/Woodl~e.will be providing, to you. ~or the EIS or when ~Mese submit~als wmll be avamlable and ~xn~l. Consequently, ~hat the ~CA Solid Waste not be identified re~nd pe~t a pe~t ~or which info~ation will be gathered conc~rently with EIS pf~pa~mtion, pursusnt to 6 MCAR 3.030E.l.c., ~less BFI/Woodl~e ~Ke· A co~itment to provide the ~CA with ~ pe~it s~eci1.c I