08/07/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I ! I I I I I I i I I I I I I I i I intrinsteall~ suitable for use as a sanitary landfill provided that cer~ai~ measures, to be discussed below, are performed. (See MPCA O~der, Order No. 3.) Site P was designated by the Metropoli~ani Council as a candidate site pursuant to Resolution No. 82-182,1 Resolution Re~ardin~ Council Review of Proposed Candidatei. L&ndfill Site P in Ramsey, Anoka County, ("Metro Council Resolution"), dated September 23, 1982, and approved as a suitable ~it¢ for disposal of mixed municipal solid waste. Both the MPCA ~an~ Metropolitan Council considered the wetland areas discussed.inlthe memorandum of the Anoka Soil and Water Conserva- tion DiSt~ie~ prepared by P. L. Rudolph, District Conservation Aide ("~D !Memo") and found, the Commission hereby finds, that good operational practices and standard erosion control engineer- lng, such as are set forth in the General Engineering and Operat- ing PlanS~ W~ste Management of Minnesota Sanitary Landfill, /M~oka County, M~nn~sota, ("Plans"), are acceptable resolutions to the problems, ass~ciatedl: with the wetlands in the South 70. (See MPCA Order; Me'roi council Resolution.) Both the MPCA and the Metro- politan ~Oun~il considered the soils discussed in the SWCS Memo and found} a~d the Corrmlission hereby finds, that the presence of such soils d not render the site unsuitable for use as a land- fill prov~d that a system of double liners and leachate col- lecti6n S~st~m, consistent with final approvals and licenses of appropriate ¢overnmental units, are installed. (See MPCA Order; Metro Co~R~i~ Resolution.) 10. 'Th~ North 80. The North 80 presently serves as a buffer aZea ~etween the Anoka/Ramsey Landfill and homes adjacent 4