Laserfiche WebLink
~ne~osure (D2-b) oontains an area location map showing the property in <br />igue~tion. <br /> <br />i~ission Action: Your action will be to recommend approval/dis- <br /> pp~oval of Mr. Rick Poster's request. ~he fo/lowing proposed motion <br /> hereby submitted for your oonsideration: <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by to recommend <br />approval/disapproval of Mr. Rick Foster's request to subdivide by <br />metes and bounds a one plus acre parcel from the U.B. property <br />that lies just south of the proposed bridge right-of-way. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no <br /> <br />No~e: If your recormendation is to approve, then you should require <br />certificates of survey for both parcels. If your recon~endation is to <br />.del~, then Mr. Foster would ask if he could proceed to preliminary <br />plait approval for your January meeting. <br /> <br /> RI OUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM I~.B. (URBAN BUSINESS) TO U.M,B. <br /> tAN MULTIPLE BUSINESS); CASE OF MR. I~ICK FOSTER, I~IVE~'S BF..ND <br /> <br /> Rick Foster, representing River's Bend Properties, is requesting <br />au'~horization to rezone approximately four acres of property south of <br /> proposed bridge crossing from U.B. to U.M.B. The property in <br /> question is all that remains south of the proposed Food and Fuel. <br /> Inasmuch as U.M.B. is a more restrictive zoning than U.B., it will <br /> ' probably provide a better buffer up against the City of Anoka. <br /> following irons are included as enclosure (D2-c) for your consi- <br /> deration in this matter: <br /> <br /> a) Applicant's application <br /> b) Public hearing notice <br /> c) List of properties notified <br /> d) Area location map <br /> <br /> ~ission Action: Your action will be to recommend approval/dis- <br /> a[~proval of this request. The following proposed motion is hereby <br /> s ,u,Dmitted for your consideration: <br /> <br /> Motion by and seconded by to recommend <br /> approval/disapproval of Mr. Rick Foster's request to rezone the <br /> property described in the public hearing notice from U.B. to <br /> U.M.B. <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes _. <br /> Voting no . <br /> <br />(~MPARISON OF RAMSEY'S EXISTING ~ORSE ORDINANCE WITH THAT PRESEN .T~n. <br />BI~ ~E PAMSEY RANGERS SADDLE CLUB: <br /> <br />A~ the November 5, 1984 meeting, Mr. Shumway of the Ramsey Rangers <br />Saddle Club presented a proposed horse ordinance for your considera- <br />tion. Oontained in enclosure (D2-d) is a comparison of the proposed <br />8%ddle Club ordinance and the City's existing ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />