Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />COMMITTEE INPUT <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />CC) The City should probably require a <br /> non-refundable escrow amount to be <br /> placed with the City to recover <br /> engineering costs and City Staff <br /> time if project never materializes. <br />dd) Developers desiring to use City <br /> bonding power - The City will need <br /> to have a policy regarding fee title <br /> of land, etc. to protect the City <br /> and tax payers. <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Develop proposed policy for assessing public improvements <br />such as water and sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets. <br />A partial listing of the areas to be discussed here are <br />contained in enclosure (D2-a) paragraph 2b. <br /> <br />Summary - As stated above in Case #1, the committee should appoint <br />subcommittees to work on the different areas and th~n bring their <br />recommendations to the committee's regular meetings for discussion <br />and approval. If done by this means, we can get better utilization <br />of people's talents and time. <br /> <br />City Staff will be available to help the committee with research, <br />etc., however, requests for use of City Staff time must be coordi- <br />nated through the City Administrator. The City Administrator will <br />further address this issue at the meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />