My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/08/1992
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1992
>
Agenda - Council - 12/08/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 9:03:52 AM
Creation date
2/25/2004 9:07:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/08/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />At the last: Co~ncil meeting, residents proposed assessing a fee against utility revenues <br />from comrherei,!al as well as residential customers (if a fee is to be assessed at all). Staff has <br />requested ~hatthe utilities provide, by account name, revenues received from this customer <br />base. At: the writing of this case, the data has not yet been received. It continues to be the <br />Staff position that Council should avoid such a charge due to a Iow level of revenue <br />received while Impacting a small customer base greatly (See Exhibit 7). <br /> <br />It also continues to be the Staff position that the City should charge the utilities for the <br />unique l~vel o~ services they receive. This is similar to charges to developers and other <br />utilities, including our own, wherein one pays for the level of service received beyond <br />basic poltce, fi(e, parks and public works delivery systems. <br /> <br />It also col~flnue.S to be the Staff position that: <br /> <br />1) it is. iml~erative that we provide for stability in revenue sources; <br />2) we ProVide for future reductions in transfers from the State to avoid spikes in future <br /> tax ~lev~s; and <br />3) we';prov~ide a stable funding source for services delivered to the citizens at marginal <br /> teV~ls at present. Examples include: <br /> ~t} the mostly undeveloped park system; <br /> b) improvements to the transportation system mandated by the <br /> Metropolitan Council; <br /> C) needed infrastructure improvements such as storm drainage <br /> improvements which were planned in 1980 but for which only <br /> : minor improvements have occurred, or priority intersection street <br /> lighting; <br /> fully funding the fixed asset fund allowing for replacement of <br /> vehicles and equipment in a fashion to enhance service delivery; <br /> future improvements to public works and public safety facilities. <br /> <br />Recommendalion: <br /> <br />Staff recommends introducing the ordinance establishing franchise fees at the rate of 3% on <br />residential irevehues. <br /> <br />Council 'Action: <br />Motion to introduce Ordinance g92-XX establishing franchise fees at the rate of 3% on <br />residential revet~ues. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: Copies also distributed to: <br />City Administrator Finance Officer <br /> <br />CC: 12/08/92 <br /> <br />q? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.