Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Councilmember <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION #92-09- <br />RESOLUTION iDISALLOWING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ~92-12 <br />(BITUMINOU~ SURFACING IMPROVEMENT OF 177TH AVENUE N.W. <br />FROM ST. iFRANCIS BLVD. N.W. TO ITS EASTERN TERMINUS) <br /> wHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 29th day of June, 1992, fixed <br />a date for a Cour~cil hearing on the proposed improvement of bituminous surfacing of 177th <br />Avenue N.W.,~ fror~ St. Francis Blvd. N.W. (Improvement Project g92-12); and <br /> WHERE~S, the required sixty (60) days has elapsed following the public hearing; and <br /> <br /> WHEREP~S, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was <br />given and the~:heaJ'ing was held thereon on the 14th day of July, 1992,at which time all persons <br />desiring to be hear~l were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and <br /> <br /> wHEREA~S, the Ramsey City Council has received a petition on the 14th day of July, <br />1992 signed bY four property owners, representing 57 percent of the affected property owners, in <br />opposition to ~e proposed project. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSE¥, ~NOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) That the proposed Improvement Project g92-12 (bituminous surfacing for 177th Avenue <br /> N.W. !fror~ St. Francis Blvd. N.W. to its eastern terminus) is hereby disallowed as <br /> proposed i,fl the Council resolution adopted the 29th day of June, 1992. <br /> <br />2) Thatprop~sed Improvement Project g92-12 may not be considered for a period of one year <br /> from the 14th day of July, 1992 as stated in Chapter 8 of the Ramsey City Charter. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> ~ . [ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the folloWing Voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following ~ibstained: <br /> <br />and the following Were absent: <br />whereupon said re~;olution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council this <br />the 22nd day Of Sgptember, 1992. <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />Mayor <br /> <br />City AdministratOr; <br /> <br /> <br />