Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> c) Overdue annual emissions test (which has now been provided). <br /> d) Ot.iside storage on Lots 2 and 3 without providing for required screening. <br /> e) InStallation of afterburner on second melt furnace (which may be attributable to <br /> hefi~vy workload and staff changes at MPCA). <br /> <br />Recommendati0~n: <br /> <br />The Planning~nd Zoning has recommended approval of the conditional use permit amendment for <br />reasons dese' ~bed e' arlier in this report. <br /> <br />City Staff re¢0mni, ends approval of the request for an amended conditional use permit for Danny's <br />AluminUm ProcesSing, Inc. The recommendation is based on the following: 1) Alloy Recovery is <br />a similar oPei3atiol~ and is permitted to disassemble engines and transmissions within a building. <br />Mr. Karst is ~ropbsing to construct a building for that purpose. , Also, the Planning and Zoning <br />Commissiot~ has ~reviously recommended approval of Mr. Karst s request to diassemble engines <br />and transmiSsionS[at his facility. 2) In talking to Anoka County Environmental Services, there are <br />no regulatory~age0cy concerns with a facility that collects non-hazardous metals and batteries for <br />recycling pn~ose~. Reasonably, the City is concerned that while these types of facilities are not <br />considerecl bE mort to be desireable corporate citizens, there is a need for the service offered as a <br />result of stfiogen! landfilling regulations. Then if we participate in responsible solid waste <br />managemeat activity and approve the conditional use permit, we have to be concerned with the <br />ultimate size and aesthetic value of such a facility. The 35% lot coverage requirement in addition to <br />requiring a tolallylenclosed operation within a 6 year time frame is a step in the right direction to <br />improvingthgae~thetic value of these types of facilities and setting a precedent for any future <br />proposals the Citylmight receive. <br /> <br /> CounCil Action: <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />AdOPt a r <br />Processing <br /> <br />-and, <br /> <br />;solution adopting Findings of Fact # relating to Danny's Aluminum <br />Inc.'s request for an amended conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />Deny ;.the !request for an amended conditional use permit from Danny's Aluminum <br />ProceSsing, Inc.based on the findings of fact. <br /> <br />Motion to:, <br />Adopt; Res{01ution approving the issuance of an amended conditional use permit to Danny's <br />Aluminum[ Processing, Inc. based on the findings of fact and declaring terms of permit. <br /> <br />Review Che~tdist: i <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />CC: 9/22/92 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />