Agenda - Council - 07/14/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I i I I ! I I I I I I I Cot~nfissioner!D~ ncr moved the adoption of the following findings of fact: FINDINGS OF FACT #0298 REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS PIN 10.32-25-11-0001 1. That Tim a~d Brenda Smith, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", have properly applied for a B~ ard, of Adjustment variance from Chapter 9.02 (Street Frontage) on the property generally kOown as PIN 10-32-25-11-0001. and legally described as follows: r~ iTha~ part of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 132, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 471.50 feet [-thereof, and lying west of the east 1100.00 feet thereof. 2. A public h4aring was conducted by the Board of Adjustment pursuant to Chapter 9.03.05 (Varia6¢eS]~ of the Ramsey City Code on May 23, 1991 and that said public hearing was prol~rl~ advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of ~es~ findings by reference. Further, that the Apphcant did appem' before the Board of Adjgstmont at its special meeting on May 23, 1991. . 3. That ~ subject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 7.4 acres in 4. That th~ subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning. 5. That ChaPter 9.02 of the Ramsey City Code states that in no case shall the street frontage in the Rtt~,~ ~¢a be less than 200 feet. 6. That a~memo dated May 23, 1991 from Project Manager Jim Gromberg to Zoning Admia~tratOr Sylvia Y*rolik is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. That th~ City has previously granted a variance for a similar request. 8. That the sp~ial conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. 9. That th~ gr,anfing of the variance will not grant the Applicant any speci~d privilege that is denied by thir'S chapter to other owners of land in the same district. 10. That if granied, the variance will be materially detrimental to the purposes of this chapter or other pl~pe~'ty in the same zone. 11. That ifigra~.ted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, ~¢ $~bstanfially impair property values within the neighborhood. The motion.fo~ th¢~option of the foregoing findings of fact was duly seconded by Commissioner Thomd and upbn VOte being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chaim~ Terry Hendriksen commi~siofier Ben Deemer Co~siO,her Bradley Thomd Com~sio~er David Bawden Co~siofi~er Gerald Zimmerrnan