Agenda - Council - 07/14/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved for its RESOLUTION #92-07- A RESOLUTION RESCINDING FINDINGS OF FACT g0298 AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT # IN RESPONSE TO AN APPEAL OF TIlE DENIAL FOR A VARIANCE TO'-g'T-REET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS ON PIN 10-32- 25.11-0001 1. That Tim and Brenda Smith, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", have properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance from Chapter 9.02 (Street Frontage) on the property generally known as PIN 10-32-25-I 1-0001. and legally described as follows: That part of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 471.50 feet thereof, and lying west of the east 1100.00 feet thereof. 2. A public hearing was conducted by the Board of Adjustment pursuant to Chapter 9.03.05 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code on May 23, 1991 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. Further, that the Applicant did appear before the Board of Adjustment at its special meeting on May 23, 1991. 3. That the subject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 7.4 acres in size. 4. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning. 5. That Chapter 9.02 of the Ramsey City Code states that in no case shall the street frontage in the Rural area be less than 200 feet. 6. That a memo dated May 23, 1991 from Project Manager Jim Gromberg to Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. That the City has previously granted a variance for a similar request. 8. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. 9. That the granting of the variance Will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to other owners of land in the same district. 10. That if granted, the variance WILL/WILL NOT be materially detrimental to the purposes of this chapter or other property in the same zone. 11. That if granted, the variance wiI1 not increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair property values within the neighborhood. 12. THAT THE APPLtCAN~F HAS REQUESTED ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM THE ONLY LOCATION WHERE STREET FRON~I'AGE IS AVAILABLE. ! i i I I ! I i I I I ! ! I I I I