03/26/92 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. The motion thereof: Thai i[~ gra~, ted, the proposed v,ariance will/will not unreasonably increase the congestion in That ~f gr'4n~ ted, the proposed variance will/will not adversely ~mpact the degree of public heal~ Safr~tY and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. Tha/: granted, the proposed variance will/will not unreasonably diminish establiShed prope .~y v~ues within the neighborhood. That We Iv [ississippi River setback requirement imposes/does not impose a hardship on the subj_~ p~ ~perty that is not applicable to other lands in the same district and that the variance is n~ssm y for the preservation of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by °thex~r°l~)rties in the R-1 Rural Residential District. That ~e u:lique circumstances on the subject property do/do not result from the actions of [ ii . Tha$ i~ gr .a[nted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied,, to i~ther owners of land in the same district. That t ~e best for the variance is/is not a result of nonconforming lands, structures or buildil tgs:~ the same district. That t ~v~riance requested is/is not the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intend ~ p~rpose of the Applicant.. 3r tl~e adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor and the following voted against the same: and the foll0~ing ~bstained: and the follovqing ~vere absent: · Ir whereupon s~id reisolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the __ day ~f , ., 1992. ATTEST: City Adminlsl :ato~ Chairman