Laserfiche WebLink
Case #2: ~C0mmission Compensation. <br /> <br />As the City !s currently drafting its 1993 budget, a question has arisen as to the monthly <br />reimbursements for commission members. As stated in Finance Officer Helling's enclosed memo <br />(Exhibit A 0fi'thege minutes), these payments may be subject to IRS withholding and reporting. <br />All Commiss~ns have been asked to give comment as to how they would like these payments to <br />be handled af;~r j~nuary 1, 1993. <br /> <br />After a brie~ diSjeussion and information from Chairperson Wagner that most Economic <br />Development i2ommissions in the area (including Coon Rapids) are not paid. <br /> [ . <br />Motion by Commissioner Fults and seconded by Commissioner Nelson not to pay the <br />Commission members their monthly payments after January 1993. However, this money would <br />remain in the. ~ud~t of the Economic Development Commission to be used for programs in which <br />the EconOmic~eV¢topment Commission has become involved. <br />Motion carrie4:l. Voting Yes: Chairperson Wagner, Commissioners Nelson, Fults, Greenberg, <br />Gorecki and yevefi. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Kent and Schroeder. <br />Comm~ssmne?.K0nt provided additional information from his CPA firm and stated that if an <br />individual re~;ve~ less than $400 from self-employment per year, they need not include it on <br />individual taxi retUrns. As the Commission members are not employees of the City, they would <br />quahfy underlthxs [rule. Commxss~oner Kent will do some addmonal research and prowde more <br />information in[the near future. <br /> ,, <br />Case #3: i Sauter & Sons Proposed Concrete Recycling Facility. <br /> <br />The City of Ra, msey has received an application for a concrete recycling facility to be located at the <br />corner of Cognty'Road #116 (Industry Avenue N.W.) and County Road #57 (Sunfish Lake <br />Boulevard N.W.); iThe site is currently an undeveloped 35 acre parcel which is zoned Industrial. <br />A conditional~useipermit is required for this proposed project because of the nature of the use. <br />Some surroUr~din,.g businesses such as ParaBody, Mate Punch and Die, CAPCO. Industries and <br />Waltek, whicl~ areimore along the lines of light manufacturing, have spent considerable funds on <br />their facilities.~ Th~ EDC may wish to recommend denial of the application as received. The EDC <br />should suppO~ growth of the local tax base, encourage compatible uses and the protection of <br />people's investrnents in their facilities. <br /> <br />The EDC revi-..we6 the somewhat limited information provided Sauter & Sons for their concrete <br />recycling facility proposal. The EDC reserved comment on the issue until additional information <br /> Thins information should include the following as suggested: <br /> <br />was ava/lable. <br />a) Screening <br /> <br />b) Type:and <br /> shows thrt <br /> and busin~ <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />~[or the facility as it is a high visibility area. <br /> <br />ayoUt of the structures that will be located on the site as the site plan provided only <br />stockpiles of material. This will affect the appearance of the facility to area traffic <br />;SS~S. <br /> <br />The lengt~ of:the operation on this site. Included with this information should be information <br />regarding ~e ease of changing the location of the operation if a buyer were to develop the site <br />for anoth~/Use. J. ' <br /> <br />ECOnomic <br /> <br />Development Commission/September 9, <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />1992 <br /> <br /> <br />