My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/09/1992
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1992
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/09/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 11:17:14 AM
Creation date
2/26/2004 2:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
07/09/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROFOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO WOODLAND GREEN <br /> <br />CASE <br />PARK <br /> <br />#1 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Eight residents attended the Joint City Council and Park and Recreation Commission <br />meeting in!JuiCe to request development of park property west of Roanoke Street N.W. and <br />across fro~ l~Sth Lane N.W. The focus of their request appeared to be: 1) a playfield <br />without sa~ld~rrs and 2) play equipment. <br /> <br />City Staff[mailed the affected/benefitting residents, adjacent to the park areas, a letter <br />proposingi:deyelopment of a trail through Woodland Green Park, thereby providing <br />improved i3c~ss to the park which contains basic play equipment and a lesser quality <br />playfield. Re~lidents were asked to respond at Staff level or attend the Council meeting to <br />express their ~iew. <br /> <br />Attached f6r your review: <br /> <br /> July 15, 1992 City Council Case sheet - contains additional information <br /> Wo~l~nd Green Park Plan <br /> Jun~ 20, 1992 letter to residents <br /> <br />ObservatiOn: <br /> <br />The purpoS9 of this case is for the Commission and residents to comment on the Woodland <br />Green Park PrOposal or neighborhood park development within the area. <br /> <br />For your irffo~atior~two residents have contacted City Staff to suggest that this solution <br />does not address their needs. <br /> <br />Commissi~on'! action: <br />Based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br /> <br /> CitY Adminisu'ator <br /> Parks/Utilities Coordinator <br /> <br />P&R: 7/9/92 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.