My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/09/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 03/09/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:23:17 PM
Creation date
3/5/2004 1:01:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/09/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councihn,;n~f,c~' }!h.,ig slated that it would seem fairly simple to monitor the amount of people <br />that usc thu ;'~u:ilil,'. <br /> <br />Councilnl,:~t~c~~ ( ~o1~ replied that the problem is that they would not be able to afford to <br />m~i~tain t[~u r;,.t in~q~i~g area it'they can't allow a certain amount ofpeople to use it. <br /> <br />Assisttmt ~'~,~n n u ~ity l)ex, elopment Director Olson noted that the swimming pond is still listed <br />as tm altcquti~;, bul thc amottnt of parking availability is just not there. One of the things he <br />suggesled w:t.; i oo:i ng at thc bottom of the sledding hill as a location for the swimming pond. <br /> <br />Councilmcu ~l'x,~ l'~h, ig stated that if the goal is to have a swinmaing pond and it is a high priority <br />item then wl~',.' not develop the park appropriately to accommodate it. <br /> <br />Mayor (;a~tc.'-_: :uE~gextcd that maybe they should be looking at constructing an indoor aquatics <br />ccnlcr inst,:ud bu,,:,~usc it could then be used year around. <br /> <br />(?ouncilmc~;lu:,- ( ;..x~k stated that he would rather spend 1.5 million on a community center than a <br /> <br />City Admi n ist~ ~to~ Norman explained that the developer has four signature parks where they are <br />proposing u~ .'-;ix:nd their money, but that does not include the two retail parks. It was staff's <br />opinion th.d ti~c t~a& ~o thc north has the lowest priority at this time. <br /> <br />Councilmur~ d-,~'r/'.Jvig inquired if staff was getting the feeling that the developer was developing <br />l)arks Ibr )'..'sidcniiul rxther than commercial. <br /> <br />Assistant l )iut~mur .~1' I~ttl~lic Works Olson explained that the proposal does identify what Ramsey <br />Town (ientur !~!J.' is planning on paying for and what they are not paying for. Mr. Olson <br />reviewud ,.viral v-.< ufld ho included fi'om their participation for each of the parks in the current <br />proposal. It w:m n~t. ed that there are still a few issues that need to be resolved and Ramsey Town <br />Center, l,[,( ' ir-; ,ye,king to amend the proposal. <br /> <br />C. ouncilmcml',cl Z:m~m;rman inquired if any of the developments that go into the Town Center <br />will still p',ty I~:l,'l~: dcdicxlion. <br /> <br />Assistanl l)iuc','ior ~)I' I'ublic Works Olson replied no, if the Council accepts this park plan. <br /> <br />Councilmc~bu~ Z nmx:.rman stated that that was a concern to him because if they collect all of <br />the park dod ~t::!~ ion now il may take a few years for the Town Center to develop completely and <br />during thai ti~c: i>m'2 dedication Fees would increase and the City will not be able to collect that <br />increased ~:IIIiOII Il, <br /> <br />Mayor (kuJu:x >.t:~l. ,d fl~u.t tie thought the developer should have to be responsible for the project, <br />it' th c p rep, m:_t! i; u} qm)ved, even if' it takes them a few years to complete and the costs increase. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/March 1, 2004 <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.