My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/11/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/11/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:33:09 AM
Creation date
3/10/2004 12:46:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
out the responses to agencies and persons making the corrnnents. These responses were received <br />by the appropriate persons/agencies on January 12, 2004. Persons and agencies then have ten <br />business days to object to the City's responses. This ten day period ended on January 23, 2004. <br />The City received no objections to its responses. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the use of RALF funds and when those funds would be paid out. It was <br />noted that RALF funds are funds the City would receive for acquiring right of way. <br /> <br />Councihnember Strommen stated that a couple of the agencies had some questions about the <br />storm water and ponding and the response was that the City was not actually building <br />infrastructure at this time. She thought the agencies were mainly concerned that there would be <br />adequate land for ponding and storm water in the future. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon replied that the response was sent back to <br />those agencies and they did not respond. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen inquired if the City is planning on complying with the MNRA <br />because there are some really strict guidelines. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmernber Pearson inquired how storm water runoff will be addressed. He questioned if <br />the City will be responsible for the stonr~ water runoff from the Highway. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon replied that he would assume the current <br />drainage system is not adequate, but any new storm water management practices would have to <br />be adhered to and would be a State cost; however, they do see a lot of opportunities with the <br />Town Center to combine a lot of those things together. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Strormnen,-to adopt Resolution <br />#04-01-018 approving the Final Highway #10 AUAR. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon noted a few typos <br />that needed to be changed in the resolution. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councih-nembers Elvig, Strolrunen, Pearson, <br />and Zimlnennan. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmembers Cook and Kurak. <br /> <br />Case #4: Report from Public Works <br /> <br />The Public Works Colmnittee met on January 20, 2004, to discuss the following cases: <br /> <br />1) 2t}04 Street Maintenance Program <br />The Public Works Colnmittee directed staff to research how other cities handle projects that <br />include townhomes, present some alternative assessment possibilities, and make some <br />recommendations on policy changes. <br /> <br />2) Consider Establishing a Vision Clearance Triangle into Cit3~ Code <br />The Public Works Committee tabled action for further information until the next Public Works <br />Committee meeting. <br /> <br />City. Council/January 27, 2004 <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br /> <br />P23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.