1954-1978 Resolutions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2. · Mr. Walk~_~ has failed to prograph his schedt~le so that impoztant assigned tasks are tin~_ly c~npleted; specific ey~n~les are as follows: a) b) Failure to have the City's newsletter mailed tima~ly so *~bat the residents would have notice of the Sprin,~ 1976 tree saleo Failure to cause ~he brochure~ concerning the rm~.cipai center re:ferendum to be r~il~, to the CiLqf~s resid, eD~s prior to the Juno 15, 1976 election date° 3. Mr Wa~[er has failed to exhibit essential leadership qualiti~_s which are necessary, for the position of B~Iministrative Assistant~ specific exsmples are as follu~s: a) b) Mr. Wa~er disotyayed tl~e City Council and tJ~e personnel committee's directive by show~g ~e Jsnus~ 1~ 1976 personnel c~t'cee ~u'tes ~D ~e City's ~lqfe~s~ Mr. Wa~er tod~ this action unilaterally without discuss~g it wi~ the ~rsonnel ~r~.t~e or City ~uncil ~ th~ reset of ~is action was ,a serious r~sin~re~n~on of "~qese minutes by one of ~]e city's ~ployees. Mr.° Walke~ did not effectuate the permanent employment statu~ of Robert C2~sper Jm an efficient procedural maDner~ This J.t~3~ is more thoroughly discussed on pag~ 3 of ~/te Jt~l'y 8, 1976 hearing minutes° c) Mr. Walker failed 'to properly oversee and lend appropriate administrative leaderst~ip to ~l~e City's assessing parsonnelo ~e Anoka Com~,ty Assessor advised the Cit/f initially on M~nrch 1G~ 1976~ that the assessing books %,~-%re not 9ompleted and the books were then returned 'to the CiL~f for Mr o Walker assured the p~rsonl~el co]~mittee and the Cit7 Council that the books were being properly completed. The secoy~] ti]ne around t_he assessing books were tlu~ned in again the again rejected ~J~em retui~ng them to the City for furrier coz~ectiono g_~qis resulted i~ added clerical e)~p=~nse~ ar~] loss of local board of review~ hearing° d) Mro Walker improperly inte~cpreted the City's s%~_bdivision~ ordinance and did not use supportive admir~istrativ~ to assist in its interpretation°