Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin January 10, 2015 1 Volume 9 1 Issue 1 <br />private landowner may challenge the validity of a special use permit <br />in an action brought pursuant to Illinois Municipal Code § 11-13- <br />15—which permits private actions to enforce zoning violations. <br />The Background/Facts: In July 2009, Gene Talley ("Talley") <br />was the zoning officer for the Village of Saybrook, Illinois (the <br />"Village"). While acting as the zoning officer, Talley issued a build- <br />ing permit to himself for the construction of a 42 -foot by 72 -foot <br />storage structure ("shed") on property he owned in the Village's <br />R-1 residential district. Later, the Village's attorney advised Talley <br />to cease construction until he established a principal use on his prop- <br />erty or he applied for a conditional -use permit. <br />Eventually, the Village adopted a zoning amendment, reestablish- <br />ing a zoning board of appeals to consider special -use applications. <br />In February 2010, Talley applied for a special -use permit to <br />construct the shed on his property. Through adoption of an ordi- <br />nance, the Zoning Board of Appeals (the "Board") approved Tal- <br />ley's application for a special use permit to allow the accessory use <br />of the shed on Talley's property. Talley was issued a special use <br />permit and a zoning certificate allowing the use. <br />In 'April 2010, Talley's neighbor, Renee Nord ("Nord") filed a, <br />complaint against, among others, Talley. In an amended complaint, <br />Nord alleged, among other things, that "Talley's actions violated <br />the zoning ordinance," as the special use permit Talley obtained <br />was "void in that it was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, and <br />bore no substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, <br />comfort, or general welfare of the Village and its residents." <br />Talley sought summary judgment. He asked the court to find that <br />there were no material issues of fact in dispute and to decide the <br />matter in his favor on the law alone. Talley argued that he was <br />entitled to summary judgment because § 11-13-15 of the Illinois <br />Municipal Code (Municipal Code) (65 ILCS 5/11-13-15) allows a <br />private citizen to enforce zoning violations but does not allow a <br />private citizen to challenge the validity of a zoning regulation. <br />Section 11-13-15 of the Municipal Code states, in pertinent part: <br />In case any building or structure . . . is constructed . . . or any build- <br />ing or structure . . . or land is used in violation of an ordinance or or- <br />dinances adopted under Division 13, 31 or 31.1 of the Illinois Munic- <br />ipal Code, . . . any owner or tenant of real property, within 1200 feet <br />in any direction of the property on which the building or structure in <br />question is located who shows that his property or person will be <br />substantially affected by the alleged violation, in addition to other <br />remedies, may institute any appropriate action or proceeding (1) to <br />prevent the unlawful construction . . . or use, (2) to prevent the oc- <br />20.15 Thomson Reuters 3 <br />