Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/12/2015

Home

Alternatives Alternative #1. Confirm the policy direction to not include a City park within the proposed development. This alternative would allow the proposed development to move forward as presented. Park Dedication and Trail Development obligations would be satisfied by cash contribution. Alternative #2. Amend the policy direction to include a City park within the proposed development. This would require the Applicant to revised the proposed development as presented. The addition of a park in this area would reduce resources available for other future improvements already planned and would add to the City's ongoing maintenance costs. (The Park and Recreation Commission previously held that, there are adequate parks, recreation, and open spaces available to the proposed development within reasonable distance.) This alternative would reduce or eliminate the cash contribution to the Park Trust Fund to be utilized to enhance the existing, surrounding parks and trail connections. Funding Source: All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for required infrastructure costs and development fees required to serve the development. This project is subject to a Purchase Agreement between the City and N.I.K. Management, as the Subject Property is currently owned by the City. Infrastructure costs have the potential to impact the net revenue of the project pro -forma. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City confirm the existing Parks and Trail Master Plan and not include a new City park within the proposed development known as Harvest Estates. Action: Motion to recommend that the City Council confirm the existing Parks and Trail Master Plan and not include a new City park within the proposed development known as Harvest Estates. Attachments Site Location Map Sketch Plan Tentative Review Schedule Staff Review File Planning Commission Presentation dated February 5, 2015 Planning Commission Supplemental Report dated February 5, 2015 Recommended Policy Statement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mark Riverblood Mark Riverblood 02/05/2015 01:57 PM Tim Gladhill (Originator) Tim Gladhill 02/05/2015 02:02 PM Tim Gladhill (Originator) Tim Gladhill 02/05/2015 02:03 PM Grant Riemer Grant Riemer 02/05/2015 02:27 PM Form Started By: Tim Gladhill Started On: 02/03/2015 02:40 PM Final Approval Date: 02/05/2015