My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/12/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/12/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:56:26 PM
Creation date
3/9/2015 9:18:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park and Recreation Commission <br />Meeting Date: 02/12/2015 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />5. 1. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Recommendation Confirming Existing Master Parks and Trail Plan Regarding the Sketch Plan of Harvest <br />Estates Located at 15153 Nowthen Blvd NW; Case of N.I.K. Management, Inc. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to confirm the current Master Parks and Trail Plan as it relates to the Sketch Plan for <br />Harvest Estates, a proposed 45 -lot detached, single-family subdivision on the former municipal center campus <br />located at 15153 Nowthen Blvd. NW. The topics of confirmation include the following: <br />Sketch Plan Review is a process outlined in City Code that provides an opportunity for the Planning Commission to <br />review compliance with the Comprehensive Plan as well as Zoning and Subdivision Codes (City Code Chapter <br />117) before an Applicant spends resources on detailed civil engineering drawings. The Parks and Recreation <br />Commission does not traditionally review Sketch Plans; however, given the significant policy topics, confirmation <br />of direction is warranted before the Applicant proceeds with future review steps. This step is not required by <br />Minnesota Statute Chapter 462; however, it provides for a more proactive and collaborative design approach in an <br />effort to avoid issues at a later date. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within 700 feet of the boundaries of the Subject Property of the <br />Sketch Plan Review via Standard US Mail. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations <br />The City is currently in the process of completing the necessary steps for the required Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment and Zoning Amendment if the site is to redevelop as proposed. <br />The proposed 45 -lot single-family subdivision appears to comply with all minimum bulk standards of City Code <br />Chapter 117 Article III (Subdivision Standards) and Section 117-111 (R-1 Residential District). A detailed analysis <br />of this review is included in the attached Staff report. The Applicant is required to demonstrate in additional detail <br />compliance with required setbacks for future structures. <br />The site is still actively being used as Fire Station No. 2. The City Council recently approved the site plan, accepted <br />final plans and specifications, and authorized Staff to advertise for competitive bids for construction of a new Fire <br />Station No. 2 as reviewed by the Planning Commission. In the coming months, the City Council will consider <br />awarding a contract for construction. The redevelopment of the site will need to happen in phases. <br />Master Park and Trail Plan <br />As the redevelopment of the old municipal center has been discussed over a number of years and has taken a <br />number of forms, A topic that routinely is raised is the potential for a new City Park. The City has routinely <br />responded that it does not plan for a future City Park in this development. The area is well served by existing parks, <br />connected through a series of pedestrian trails. Additionally, the focus of the Parks and Recreation Commission has <br />shifted away from a series of smaller 'pocket' parks to larger communities parks with higher quality amenities <br />connected through the City's pedestrian trail system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.