Agenda - Council - 03/23/2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR R-2 AND R-3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ' By: Amy Geisler, Associate Planner Background: The City Council discussed architectural standards for multifamily development at its July 29, 2003 work session. Since then, staff has been working with the Housing Committee and the Planning Commission to draft new standards for the R-2 and R-3 Residential zoning districts. The following items are enclosed for your information: a) City Council work session minutes dated July 29, 2003 b) Planning Commission minutes dated December 4, 2003 c) Planning Commission minutes dated February 5, 2004 d) Summary of architectural standards used by surrounding communities e) Architectural standards exhibit 0 Proposed ordinances Notification: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed standards at their February 5, 2004 meeting. Observations: As the City continues to grow, the quality of new residential development will play an important role in the durability and diversity of the City's housing stock. The quality of the City's housing stock has implications fbr property values and the desirability of the area to current and prospective residents, as well as businesses. Staff has been researching architectural standards and their implementation and offers the following observations: Location of standards. Architectural standards can reside in City Code, the Comprehensive Plan, or both. Method of implementation. Architectural standards are typically implemented one of tWo ways: through specific standards spelled out in City Code (% brick required per building face, certain types of siding prohibited, etc) or through a formalized Design Review process. In the first option, City staff would evaluate development plans for compliance with specific architectural requirements established in City Code. In the second option, an appointed Review Board would review plans according to less specific requirements. Such a board typically contains members with specific architectural expertise. Cities may also choose to pursue a combination approach. The Housing Committee and the Planning Commission have recommended a Code-based approach rather than a Design Review Board. Implications of architectural standards. Architectural standards may drive up the cost of housing - to builders and ultimately to consumers. Builders are less able to use standardized, corporate designs, and materials may have a higher initial cost. On the other hand, architectural standards have the potential to produce housing that is of higher quality and design, resulting in a more durable, diverse housing stock.'