My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/20/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 12/20/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:04:50 PM
Creation date
3/22/2004 9:28:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/20/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> Page <br /> <br />legislative purpose, any act might be justified by the imagination of the attorneys. <br />See e.g., Petra~eck v. Industrial Commission~ ~54 P2d 1097 (Col. 1976) (Court <br />disregarded "administrative expediency" purpose); 3 and R Doe v. 3ames Plyler~ <br />458 F.Supp. 569 (D.Tex. 1978), Aff'd.~ 628 F2d ##g (unequal distribution of funds to <br />schools not justified by ~'cost concerns"). <br /> <br /> An excellent example of the steps to be taken in analyzing legislative <br />"purpose" in an equal protection case is found in Delaware River Basin Commission <br />v. Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority~ 641 F2d 1087 (3rd Cir. 1981). In that <br />case the court was examining the validity of a "grandfather" exemption for water <br />use charges under the rational relationship test of equal protection. The court <br />began by stating that identifying the purpose of the statute was the first step in the <br />analysis: ~'when reviewing a classification under the rationality test~ ... a court <br />must conduct a two step analysis. First, it should identify the purposes of the <br /> <br />statute and assure itself that these purposes are legitimate .... ~' Id. at 1092. In <br /> <br />identifying the purpose the court stated that "ordinarily, this inquiry will involve <br />examination of statements of purpose and other evidence in the legislative history." <br />Id. at 1092o93. The court proceeded to examine the legislative history which <br />included senate committee reports as well as statements from the commission <br />which implemented the '~grandfather' provision. The court reached the conclusion <br />that there was no indication from these sources of the legislative intent and, only <br />at that point, did it consider the possibility of looking to other sources for <br />legislative intent. The court determined that "in the face of legislative silence," <br />the court might consider the propriety of speculation about Iegislative ends by the <br />parties or by the court itself. Id. at 1094. <br /> <br /> Even though it could not find an "articulated" purpose in the legislation at <br />hand, the court in Delaware River Basin was still reluctant to allow speculation on <br />the legislative purpose: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.