My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:03:13 PM
Creation date
3/22/2004 10:23:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Ramsey City l~lanning Board <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />August 2, 1983 <br /> <br />2. Section 170. 0112F Environmental l~ermits <br /> <br />We are concerned that this section provides too <br />complicated and too costly requirements, so that <br />they will act as a deterrent to development, <br /> <br />It requires reports from hydrologests, biologists, <br />botanists, soil scientists and other technical per- <br />sons, as well as a very costly survey. It requires <br />that all flora and fauna be identified and mapped <br />including identifying, describing and mapping <br />every tree· On some of our potential lots there <br />may be more than 100 trees. <br /> <br />Gentlemen, this section is unreasonable in its re- <br />'quirements. Certainly you can devise an ordinance <br />which will accomplish your intent and still facilitate <br />development, instead of making it so di/ficult and <br />costly. This section (with others) eliminates the <br />the possibility of a small developer or land owner <br />developing the property, because of the heavy capi- <br />tal requirements. <br /> <br />3. Section 170. 011ZG (d) states: <br /> <br />"A permit may be approved subiect to compliance with <br />conditions . . .' y gui <br /> · Such conditions ma .... re re a <br />surety in the form of a performance bond, cash escrow <br />or letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the expected <br /> <br />development costs as determined by the City Engineer." <br /> <br />We have two concerns relative to this provision: <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />This is a very costly requirement which, in con- <br />junction with the costly requirements discussed <br />above, discourage development, if not make it <br />unlikely· I am told by City personnel that is is <br />not a typical provision for development else- <br />where in the City. <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />This provision has no place buried in this ordin- <br />ance. It belongs in the City Subdivision Ordinance, <br />if it is to be anywhere. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.