My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:03:13 PM
Creation date
3/22/2004 10:23:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> PROPOSED <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> <br />For Dave Brinker <br /> <br />1) That the Applicant properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance <br />to construct an accessory building prior to the construction of his single <br />family residence and that said accessory building is larger than permitted <br />by ordinance. <br /> <br />2) That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public <br />hearing pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance on September 27, 1983. That <br />said public hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public <br />hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> <br />3) That the property is legally described as Lot 2 Block 1 Alpaca Estates <br />and is generally known as 7959 - 142nd Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />4) That the applicants request is to construct an accessory building of <br />1,248 square feet while City Ordinance restricts construction to 1200 sq- <br />uare feet on parcels of property 2.5 acfes or larger. <br /> <br />5) That such a variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoy- <br />ment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other <br />properties in the same district and in the same vicinity. <br /> <br />6) That the authorization of such a variance will not be of a substantial <br />detriment to the adjance properties and will not materially impair the in- <br />tent and purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. <br /> <br />7 ) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property is <br />not so general or reoccurant in nature as to make reasonably practical <br />the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. <br /> <br />8) That the variance observes the appirt and intent of the ordinance and <br />is not contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br />9) That properly constructed, the structure will comply with the require- <br />ments of the State Building Code. <br /> <br />10) That the Applicant has agreed to enter into a Development Agreement <br />in consideration of said variance. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.