Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if this construction was for a new building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that the variance was for a temporary building. <br /> <br />Chmirman Peterson stated that he had no problem with the findings. He asked <br />if anyone else had a problem with them. <br /> <br />There was no response. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg stated that a conditional use permit was not required for the business <br />but for the structure and felt this was the best way to handle it. He will have <br />to enter into an agreement for the building. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Schneider to recommend <br />adopting the proposed findings of fact for Mr. and Mrs. James Chapman's <br />conditional use permit request. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Zimmerman, Deemer, <br />Schneider and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Kennen. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson asked Mr. and Mrs. Chapman if they had reviewed the agreement <br />and if they were in agreement with it. <br /> <br />They indicated they were. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer asked about the required setback for the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg indicated they were in compliance with the setbacks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schneider asked of City utilities become available, would the <br />buildings have to be removed within a certain period of time. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg indicated there is a time limit for their removal. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Schneider and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to recommend <br />that the City approve Mr. and Mrs. James Chapman's request for a conditional <br />use permit to construct the necessary buildings and operate a garden market <br />at 6745 West Highway #10 contingent upon their entering into an agreement with <br />the City. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mr. Chapman asked Mr. Berg what would make this a permanent <br />building. Mr. Berg stated it would have to meet the State Building Code <br />requirements. Mr. Chapman and Mr. Berg discussed briefly the code requirements - <br />permanent vs. temporary. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Zimmemran, Deemer, <br />LaDue and Schneider. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Kennen. <br /> <br />Case #2: Request For Concept Approval For Pondvale Estates Second Addition: <br /> <br />Mr. and Mrs. Mary Kytonen were present. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding access and drainage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer referred to Item #6 of the City Engineer's report and <br />stated that it should be deleted and that the City Engineer should note that <br />all park fees were paid at the time of the original plat. <br /> <br />P & Z/October 4, 1983 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />