Laserfiche WebLink
tl 4/8 3 <br /> <br />~(,mitted by: B.J.Bauerkemper <br /> <br />OUTSIDE OPINION <br /> <br />(I (generally (generally) <br /> CITY Likes Dislikes Basic Comments <br /> (city clerk) <br /> <br />  Much preferred to state plan. <br /> LAINE Special election caused only for <br /> i X park bond issues. <br /> · . <br /> '.-' Works very ~vell'. <br /> fROOKLYN ' ' "-~:'-- <br /> city <br /> -' ~. Gives more flexibility. <br /> ~C~TER '~ ' "X . ~ " ' <br /> SROOKLYN Feels it is 75% disregarded. <br /> .PARK .: X It is over-ridden by state statutes_ <br /> i. anyway. <br />  Incorporated as a <br /> charter <br /> city. <br /> OON <br /> PIDS V' Works well for running the city. <br /> Could only remember one special election- <br /> citizens reversed 'Ban-the-can'. <br /> I " <br /> H;~ Does not feel it is difficult to work <br /> $J(E X & X with, but can be more cumbersome <br /> when dealing with ordinances. <br /> <br />AK,,S <br /> <br />:! <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />I.iOUNDS <br />VI EW <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Feels that the chapter dealing with <br /> utilities was written vindictively <br /> making it cumbersome to deal with <br /> ordinances D~D resolutions. <br /> <br />Charter is better because it can cover <br /> <br /> all the options. <br /> <br />It works very well for the city. <br />Said we should make sure it says EXACTLY <br />what we mean---state intentions clearly. <br /> <br /> <br />