01/08/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Thursday of January each year and that a minimum of 10 days meeting notice be given. Motion carried. Mr. Hardin, Mr. Wagner, Mr. Alsdurf, Mr. Greenberg and Mr. Muller. Voting No: None. Absent: Mr. DeLuca, Mr. Fults, Mr. Kurak, Mr. Miller and Mr. Vevea. Company consensus was that the annual meeting agenda should include a 1986 Financial and Company Activities Report and election of officers. Mr. Wagner suggested that the meeting notice to Company members contain a cover letter urging members to attend and get involved with the Company. Mr. Wagner suggested that those businesses that have not responded to the Company stock sale also be invited to the annual meeting in order that they can see first hand what the Company is all about. Mr. Hardin volunteered to draft a cover letter to the annual meeting notice. Mr. Alsdurf donated his firm's services to print and mail the meeting notice and cover letter. Ms. Norris stated that she would draft and mail a letter to those businesses that have not responsed to the Company's stock sale inviting them to attend the Company's annual meeting. Company consensus was that the annual meeting will be scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on January 22, 1987. Case #3: Update On Extension Of Sanitary Sewer And Municipal Water To Industrial Area: Ms. Norris stated that the City Council has received a sufficient petition to oppose the proposed extension of sewer and water into the City's Industrial area. Council's o~tion now are: 1) Drop the project entirely; 2) Redefine the project scope so that it is no longer the 'same improvement' and proceed again through the special assessment process or utilize Chapter 444. Ms. Norris reported that Council has scheduled an informational meeting for January 20th to meet with affected property owners, and any other property owners that have expressed a desire for utilities, to obtain their comments and suggestions for making the project more workable and acceptable. Company members discussed the fact that affected property owners expressed concern with the fact that the project does not include laterals and another assessment for same would be required in order to make use of the system they are being charged for. A total system would be cost prohibitive to the property owners and maybe the City should consider deleting Azurite Street from the project area. Mr. Wagner stated that maybe the City should proceed utilizing Chapter 444, a method which would not involve a cost break to anybody but those properties choosing not to make use of the utilities would not be charged. Mr. Greenberg suggested that it might be a good idea for the Economic Develo~ent Commission Sewer and Water Subcommittee to meet with some of the Economic Develol~nent Company/i-8-87 Page 3 of 4