Laserfiche WebLink
8) <br /> <br />9) <br /> <br />lO) <br /> <br />11) <br /> <br />13) <br /> <br />14) <br /> <br />15) <br /> <br />16) <br /> <br />17) <br /> <br />18) <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for <br />the public to take the property by eminent domain in the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />That the proposed interim use will not result in adverse effects on the public health, safety <br />and welfare of the residents of the City. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or working <br />in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment or <br />market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will be operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and <br />appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity <br />and such use will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create additional requirements at public cost for public <br />facilities and services. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be disturbing or hazardous to existing or future <br />neighboring uses. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and <br />equipment and conditions of operation that may be detrimental to any persons, property <br />or the general welfare, by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke or glare. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will be in accordance with the objectives of the Comprehensive <br />Plan and the intent of Section 9.03.04A Interim Use Permits of the City Code. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Pearson, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereofi <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec <br />Councilmember Cook <br />Councilmember Pearson <br />Councilmember Elvig <br />Councilmember Strommen <br />Councilmember Zimmerman <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #04-02-056 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />