Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Raatikka presented a schedule of earliest dates sewer would be available <br />in certain areas of Ramsey and stated that Council has the right to delay <br />that schedule if there is no need or demand in those areas. <br /> <br />Regarding financing, Mr. Raatikka sited a sample development project of 20 <br />acres, 60 lots. From assessments received, City would invest balances on hand <br />at all times at 9%. At the end of the first year, the City would have a balance <br />on hand of $11,500, assuming that there is a pre-payment of assessments on 5 <br />of the units. Continuting to invest funds throughout the length of bond period <br />would leave the City a balance of $63,508. <br /> <br />3. Impact of a municipal water system on ground water - Presented by Mr. Tom <br /> Renner of E.H. Renner and Sons, Well Drillers: <br /> <br />Mr. Renner stated that he is not a voting citizen of Ramsey, that his business <br />is in Ramsey and he lives in Sherburne County. <br /> <br />Mr. Renner stated that he sees a possible problem existing in use of large <br />diameter well pumping systems in the City of Ramsey. He stated that it is <br />not an immediate problem, but the potential for problems exists. Ramsey is <br />in an unremediable position as far as ground water is concerned because we <br />do not have the two major acquifers beneath us that other cities to the south <br />of us have. Ramsey has two major bedrock acquifers which are condusive to <br />small amounts of water being pumped (500-600 gallons/minute). At present, <br />the existing wells in Ramsey are mostly residential, and none at this point <br />in time are high capacity and affecting the ground water. Bedrock formations <br />presently are a great asset to Ramsey in that they carry a higher artesian <br />pressure than gravel formations. We know there is contamination from landfills <br />and consequently it is being kept out of our drinking water by this upward <br />push of bedrock acquifers. Even where excellent acquifers are located, <br />contamination has shown up due to landfills and illegal landfilling. St. Louis <br />Park and New Brighton are good criteria for this happening. <br /> <br />Mr. Renner stated that he has reviewed the system that the engineering firm <br />laid out and it is as good a system as can be laid out and he contemplates it <br />not taking a lot of water out of any acquifer and there would be no problems <br />at this time, but the City has a capacity for a lot of people and 20 years <br />down the road there could be serious problems where municipal wells could <br />cause ground water contamination to take place. <br /> <br />One of Ramsey's proposed wells will interfere with one existing well in <br />Anoka and City Engineer recognizes this and is doing what he can to eliminate <br />any problems occurring but I don't think any of us are sure what will happen <br />if Ramsey grows. <br /> <br />As a businessman and property owner, I feel I have not been given as much <br />information as I would like to have with regards to cost to businessman <br />for sewer and water extensions. The business population of Ramsey is <br />concerned with the cost factor in that we do have a relatively smaller type <br />of businesses within the City and they have very little use for sewer and <br />water at this time. Other cities such as Minnetonka and Plymouth allow <br />municipal systems in for certain developments that are wholly owned and <br />operated by a subsidiary of the development. These systems are then turned <br />over to the City when it is economically feasible for the City to maintain <br />them. The present water system has been laid out very thoroughly by engineering <br />and have no objections other than timing and cost. <br /> <br />Utility Information Meeting <br /> April 19, 1983 <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />