Laserfiche WebLink
by June 20, 1983, their intended location for expansion and noted that <br />this does not have to be a final decision. Mr. Dickenson further commented <br />that they must be in their new facility by September 1, 1983. Mr. <br />Dickenson reiterated that there are other communities where then can <br />relocate to quickly, and that this is not meant as a threat. He stated <br />that he wants the business to stay in Ramsey and so do the employees. <br />Mr. Dickenson stated that the size facility they will need is 340'x140' <br />and conflicts with the uniform building code. Mr. Dickenson stated that <br />he does have a plan, not by an architect, that addresses size and building <br />materials. He also noted that an architect of Southside Lumber is preparing <br />a drawing of the facility to be constructed. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Van Wagner and Reimann stated that they are in favor of <br />researching some solutions so that Dickenson Lines can remain and expand <br />in Ramsey because it would be a real asset to the community. <br /> <br />Council agreed to a special Council Meeting to be scheduled for June 13, <br />1983 at 5:00 p.m. in order to arrange some type of agreement with <br />Dickenson Lines to deal with the situation. <br /> <br />Case #2: Miscellaneous Cases Not Acted upon By Council At Their May 31, <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />1983 Meeting: <br /> <br />Council New Business - Case #9: Status of Zoning; Case of Mr. Ben <br />Deemer: <br /> <br />Deferred until next regular Council meeting in June. <br /> <br />Council New Business - Case #10: Discussion on Callable Bonds General <br />Obligation Improvement Bond ($815M) September 1981 Purchase by the <br />City of Ramsey: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Van Wagner and seconded by Councilmember <br />Reimann to adopt Resolution #83-94 authorizing Springsted to monitor <br />the market to determine the feasibility of exercising the option of <br />calling 1981 General Obligation Bonds ($815M). (Please refer to <br />resolution file for Resolution #83-94). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, <br />Reimann, Schlueter and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Council New Business - Case #11: Trott Brook Cemetery, Request For <br />Fence Replacement: <br /> <br />Merle Mevissen was present and stated that the woven wire fencing at <br />Trott Brook does need replacing, that the homeowner to the south of <br />the cemetery is installing a split rail fence and is requesting that <br />Council reimburse him for the amount the City would have spent for <br />woven wire along that portion that abuts his property. <br /> <br />Arnie Cox - Nowthen Blvd. N.W. - Noted that in the past there have <br />been questions raised regarding whether or not Trott Brook is a <br />municipal cemetery and these questions should be answered before <br />authorizing expenditure of funds. <br /> <br />Sp C/June 6, 1983 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />