Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Elvig clarified the City played a role to bridge the finances on a no-money <br />transaction for approximately six months. This will ultimately be paid off by the bond note or <br />another source. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman inquired how money borrowed by the City would relate to this and <br />the City being bank qualified. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund explained if the City stays under the ten million dollars the school would <br />be responsible for any fees associated with the City being non-bank qualified. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt Resolution #04- <br />02-041 authorizing the issuance of approximately $11.8 million in lease revenue bonds for Pact <br />Charter School and the execution of various documents in connection with the school project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak clarified the City is not financing anything with these bonds. This is <br />merely a pass through bond and the City is covered on the back end so their rate is still protected <br />by this escrow fund. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund noted last year when the City issued its capital equipment certificates in <br />2003, PACT Charter School wanted to complete the bond issue in December. The school did <br />pay an amount of $14,000 because this made the City non-bank qualified. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig questioned if staff is certain that 8.9 million dollars is an ample bond <br />amount for the City this year. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund explained if the City bonds over ten million dollars they would become <br />non-bank qualified themselves and the escrow would not be required from the school. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained the City will have a better picture of the amounts by the time <br />these bonds are sold. If the City needs to go up an extra two million dollars they could do that <br />the day before the bonds are sold. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Kurak, Elvig, Pearson, <br />Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #3: Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Case of Scott Hagen <br /> <br />Comlmmity Development Director Frolik explained the 2001 Comprehensive Plan shows the <br />parcel south of Highway 10, immediately west of Llama Street, as Medium Density Residential. <br />A commercial use, Hi-Ten Sports, has been operating on the parcel for many years. In the <br />process of selling the property, the owner and staff became aware of the parcel's Medium <br />Density Residential land use designation. She explained the parcel was shown with a <br />Comlnercial land use in earlier drafts of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff was unable to determine <br />the rationale for changing the parcel's designation to Residential in the adopted Comprehensive <br />Plan. Staff feels that the existing commercial use of the property is more compatible with the <br />other commercial uses to the east in Alpaca Estates rather than as a Medium Density Residential <br /> <br />City Council/February 10, 2004 <br /> Page 9 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />