My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Charter Commission - 01/26/1984
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Charter Commission
>
1984
>
Minutes - Charter Commission - 01/26/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:29:22 PM
Creation date
4/1/2004 8:36:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
01/26/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion of Chapter 8 - <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman stated that he has talked with Mr. Dorn regarding the <br />Commission preparing their intent for Chapter 8 and Mr, Dorn compiling it; <br />he will not do so, his job is to criticize what the Commission writes -- <br />not to write it for us. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman stated that Mr. Dom suggested the following alternatives <br />to the initial petition: <br /> <br /> a. Increase amount of detail required in first petition including <br /> assessment formula -- it will be a more sophisticated initial petition <br /> to the Council. <br /> <br /> b. Increase to 50% the initiating petition of abutting frontage. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman stated that three concepts came out at the last Charter <br />Commission meeting: <br /> <br /> a. Existing residents have a higher priority than incoming residents. <br /> b. Idea of desired developments should not be inhibited. <br /> c. Undesireable development should be inhibited. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman summarized the Commission's intent for Chapter 8 as follows: <br /> <br /> a. Abutting can petition. <br /> <br /> b. Non-abutting cannot petition, however, they do have available to <br /> them a resolution by a 4/5 Council vote. <br /> <br />c. Abutting must be identified and notified by City. <br />d. Non-abutting must be identified and notified by City. <br />e. Abutting can vote to stop. <br />f. Non-abutting can vote to stop. <br />Discussion ensued. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Licther and seconded by Commissioner Sieber to recess. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Heitman, Commissioners Gamec, Data, <br />Bauerkemper, Lichter, Sieber and Buchanan. Voting No: None. Absent: <br />Commissioners Titterud and Greenberg. <br /> <br />The Commission recessed at 9:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman called the meeting back to order at 10:00 p.m, <br /> <br />Commissioner Buchanan expressed concern regarding projects being i00% assessed <br />before the project takes place. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued. Commissioner Gamee explained that a development contract <br />is signed by the developer and it is binding. <br /> <br />CC/January 26, 1984 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.