Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />LMC information memo <br />Meetings of City Councils. <br />For more information on the <br />60 -Day Rule see the LMC <br />information memo, The 60 - <br />Day Rule: Minnesota's <br />Automatic Approval Statute. <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99. <br />Manco of Fairmont v. Town <br />Bd. of Rock Dell Township, <br />583 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. Ct. <br />App. 1998). <br />Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. <br />City of Minnetrista, 728 <br />N.W.2d 536 (Minn. 2007). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />1(c). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />2(a). <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. <br />3b. <br />Advantage Capital Mgmt, v. <br />City of Northfield, 664 <br />N.W.2d 421 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />2003). <br />The Open Meeting Law also contains some specific notice and record- <br />keeping requirements which are discussed in detail in the LMC Information <br />Memo Meetings of City Councils. <br />B. The 60 -Day Rule <br />Cities generally have only 60 days to approve or deny a written request <br />relating to zoning, including rezoning requests, conditional use permits and <br />variances. This requirement is known as the "60 -Day Rule." <br />The 60 -Day Rule is a state law that requires cities to approve or deny a <br />written request relating to zoning within 60 days or it is deemed approved. <br />The underlying purpose of the rule is to keep governmental agencies from <br />taking too long in deciding land use issues Minnesota courts have generally <br />demanded strict compliance with the rule. <br />All planning commission review of zoning related applications must be <br />completed in a manner that allows the city to complete its entire approval <br />process within the timeframe dictated by the 60 -Day Rule. Local ordinance <br />should not establish timeframes for planning commission review of <br />applications or appeal of commission decisions that do not allow the city to <br />comply with the 60 -Day Rule. <br />1. Scope of the rule <br />The rule applies to a "request related to zoning." The courts have been rather <br />expansive in their interpretation of the phrase "related to zoning." It is useful <br />to look at the precise wording of the statute to see it covers much more than <br />just requests "related to zoning." <br />"Except as otherwise provided in this section, section 462.358 subd. 3b, or <br />473.175, or chapter 505, and notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, <br />an agency must approve or deny within 60 days a written request relating to <br />zoning, septic systems, watershed district review, soil and water <br />conservation district review, or expansion of the metropolitan urban service <br />area for a permit, license, or other governmental approval of an action." <br />The language covers requests for rezonings, conditional use permits and <br />variances. Courts have also found the law applies to requests for sign <br />permits, wetlands determination review, and road permits. <br />In short, almost all requests affecting the use of land have been treated as <br />subject to the law. Subdivision and plat approvals are an exception, since <br />those processes are subject to their own timeframes. The law also does not <br />apply to applications for building permits. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Planning Commission Guide Page 19 <br />