My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 04/20/2015 - Joint with Planning Comm
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2015
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 04/20/2015 - Joint with Planning Comm
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:01:18 PM
Creation date
5/14/2015 9:28:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Title
Joint with Planning Comm
Document Date
04/20/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />1(c). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />3(a). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />3(c). <br />Tollefson Dev., Inc. v. City of <br />Elk River, 665 N.W.2d 554 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2003). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />2(a). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />2(c). <br />Hans Hagen Homes v City of <br />Minnetrista, 728 NW 2d 536 <br />(Minn. 2007). Johnson v <br />Cook County, 786 N.W.2d <br />291 (Minn. 2010). <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. <br />2(b). <br />Building permits are issued pursuant to the State Building Code to regulate <br />the construction process, they do not regulate the use of land that may occur <br />in a particular zoning district. Therefore, they are not "related to zoning." <br />2. Applications <br />A request must be submitted in writing on the city's application form, if one <br />exists. A request not on the city's form must clearly identify the approval <br />sought on the first page. The city may reject a request not on the city's form <br />as incomplete, if the request does not include information required by the <br />city. The request also is considered incomplete if it does not include the <br />application fee. <br />The 60 -day time period does not begin to run if the city notifies the <br />landowner in writing within 15 business days of receiving the application <br />that the application is incomplete. The city must also state what information <br />is missing. <br />If a city grants an approval within 60 days of receiving a written request, and <br />the city can document this, it meets the time limit even if that approval <br />includes certain conditions the applicant must meet. Subsequently, if the <br />applicant fails to meet the conditions, the approval may be revoked or <br />rescinded. An applicant cannot use the revocation or rescission to claim the <br />city did not meet the 60 -day time limit <br />When a zoning applicant materially amends their application, the 60 -day <br />period runs from the date of the written request for the amendment, not from <br />the date of the original application. However, minor changes to a zoning <br />request should not affect the running of the 60 -day period. <br />3. Denials <br />If an agency or a city denies a request, it must give written reasons for its <br />denial at the time it denies the request. When a multimember governing <br />body such as a city council denies a request, it must state the reasons for <br />denial on the record and provide the applicant with a written statement of the <br />reasons for denial. The written statement of the reasons for denial must be <br />consistent with reasons stated in the record at the time of denial. The written <br />statement of reasons for denial must be provided to the applicant upon <br />adoption. <br />State statute provides that the failure of a motion to approve an application <br />constitutes a denial, provided that those voting against the motion state on <br />the record the reasons why they oppose the request. This situation usually <br />occurs when a motion to approve fails because of a tie vote, or because the <br />motion fails to get the required number of votes to pass. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Planning Commission Guide Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.