Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />APPROVE PURCHASE OF PLAYER BENCHES AND REVIEW PARK AND <br />RECREATION MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURE POLICY <br /> By: Mark Boos, Parks/Utilities Coordinator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Issue I: Player Benches for Central Park Fields 5 & 6. In 1991, the City added softball fields to <br />Central Park. As pan of the revision of the CIP occurring in that summer for 1992 and beyond, <br />the Park and Recreation Commission requested player benches for the two new softball fields, two <br />smaller bleachers for those fields and one larger bleacher for the baseball field. Early in 1992, the <br />Commission's improvement request was brought to the Finance Committee. The Committee <br />recommended funding Central Park's parking lot paving, but not the benches or bleachers. For <br />1993, the Ramsey Youth Athletic Association (RYAA) will be using Fields 5 and 6 for games as <br />well as practice beginning May 24, 1993. They have requested player benches for those two <br />softball fields. The City no longer has player benches specifically budgeted for Fields 5 and 6. <br />The Commission, as you may recall, has requested within the CIP a line item referred to as <br />miscellaneous capital outlay for incidental purchases such as modest playground improvements and <br />amenities. Dave Baack, RYAA President, offered 50% of the purchase cost towards the four <br />player benches to "leverage" the funding of the benches. RYAA's desire is to realize the <br />installation of the benches as early as possible. To this end, RYAA increased the contribution to <br />100% of the purchase cost to allow the City to order the benches and in the event, the Finance <br />Committee determined that the benches are not a prudent expenditure to cost share, RYAA would <br />willingly expend the entire $825 cost. If the Finance Committee approves of the 50% shared <br />expense concept, RYAA offered to allow the City to place "their half" $412 towards a different <br />improvement. <br /> <br />Subsequent to this "deal", I was informed that the issue should still come before the Finance <br />Committee prior to purchase because of the replacement fund cost implication. (The useful life of <br />the aluminum benches with back rests is projected at 25 years.) However, we did not follow this <br />procedure for prior donations such as the spring rider for Peltzer Park or player benches at River's <br />Bend Park. It would seem to be helpful for staff to be able to accept modest donation to facilitate a <br />timely receipt of contributions and to simplify the process with the donor. I would respectfully <br />suggest that small donations with longer lifespans be amenable to staff acceptance with the receipt <br />of the contribution being confmned via the Finance Committee or City Council's consent agenda. <br />More substantial donations would go before the Finance Committee with the City Administrator <br />and Finance Officer providing direction in the event that the donation was time sensitive. <br /> <br />Issue II: Public Funding of Improvements for Specific Users. Certain improvements, like player <br />benches and athletic complexes serve identifiable populations, in this example, primarily RYAA. <br />Therein lies the question of whether or to what extent those users should fund a particular amount <br />of that item's cost(s). This summer, the City supplied paint for the riding arena in Traprock <br />Commons and assisted with the donation of mateu'ials for the needed repairs to that arena. The City <br />did not perform the painting, make repairs or purchase the lumber, because the "improvement" <br />clearly benefitted a specific group and not the majority of Ramsey Residents. Conversely, a player <br />bench in a neighborhood park is used by the general public and RYAA alike and therefore should <br />be publicly funded. The policy questions asked of the Finance Committee is: In this case, should <br />the RYAA be asked, if financially able, to assist with the funding of the satellites needed as a result <br />of their activities or is it a responsibility of the City to provide restrooms no matter what generated <br />the addkional activity at the public facility (tournaments are the obvious exception). Normally, <br />smaller neighborhood parks do not need "Satellites" because of the intensive use and proximity to <br />the home of users. However, the City has provided Satellites to Autumn Heights and Bear Parks <br />this year for RYAA use during spring softball practice. <br /> <br /> <br />