My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/06/93
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
04/06/93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:23:11 AM
Creation date
4/2/2004 10:56:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
04/06/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />~) <br /> <br />Impact on MUSA expansion discussions with Metro Council Per your <br />suggestion, I did check with the City of Ham Lake regarding their similar <br />development of townhomes in a golf course PUD that did not have municipal water <br />and sanitary sewer. Upon inquiry, I was informed that none of Ham Lake is <br />served by municipal sewer and warm- systems and therefore developing the multiple <br />family housing without municipal services and at a density that exceeded 4 in 40 <br />density was not a throat to their infrastructure needs. <br /> <br />Responsibility for on-site system failures - If the City approves this premature <br />development of multiple family housing in the rural district, then what is our <br />liability or responsibility for on-site system failures and am we mating a premature <br />need for municipal services in outlying areas? <br /> <br />Precedent setting situation - How does the City justify approval of this premature <br />development of multiple family housing in the rural district to other would-be <br />developers in the rural district. If we can't, we seriously violate our 4 in 40 density <br />zoning and jeopardize Metro Council approval of our MUSA expansions. <br /> <br />The issues and concerns discussed in this letter arc not all-inclusive, but I beticve they are <br />representative of our initial thoughts with respect to your proposal and your responses to these <br />items will serve to open the door to more detailed discussions. Following resolution of these <br />concerns and any other significant issues, we can lay out the proper procedure for amending the <br />PUD accordingly. <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> <br />Sylvia Frolik <br />Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />City Administrator Ryan Schroedm- <br />City En~-qneer Steven Jankowski <br />Steve Schwanke <br />Meu'opotitan Council <br />Meats Park Centre <br />230 East 5th Street <br />St. Paul, MN 55101 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.