Laserfiche WebLink
P.2×5 <br /> <br />January 26, 1993 <br /> <br />Y*,.r. William Goodrich <br />Attorney at Law <br />2140 PouCh Avenue <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Bill= <br /> <br />Several months ago I copied you with some correspondence Z had <br />sent to Sylvia Frolik concerning our contemplated plan'to replat <br />Outlo~ C and Lot 1, Block 2,. of Rum River Eills to accommodate <br />six 2-unit towuhomes on the 4.6 acres. Sylvia responded and <br />indicated two main concerns: Met Council reaction, and the' . <br />Prece'den% that'would 'be set. I have submitted the proposal <br />.informally to the'~t Council and wil~ be meeting with. Sylvia <br />shortly to go over"that area. <br /> <br />The matter of precedent, however, will likely involve you, and ! <br />wanted to bring out several of the unique characteristics of our <br />request. I do not believe that there is another area of Ramsey <br />that would meet all of the criteria needed to establish any <br />unfavorable precedent. <br /> <br />1, S¢ooe of the Pro~ct <br /> <br />It is important to remember that we are not dealing with a 4.6 <br />acre parcel. We are dealing with one phase of a 150+ acre <br />project, and we are simply amending the.land use for one phase - <br />the Multiple Family housing phase, which we are eliminating in <br />favor of single-family housing. <br /> <br />2. Ordinance Bein~ Used '"'. <br /> <br />It mus~ also be remembered that this pr°~ect is no__~t being done <br />under the s~bdivision ordinance, bu~ rather under the PUD <br />o~dinance0. For ahy subsequent developer to.claim the right to <br />the same ~'at~ent, he-would have to be under a PUD of similar <br />scope and size'. <br /> <br /> T CIVIL TRIAL $1a~CIAI,.IST <br /> <br />C~TIFI~O BY 7H~ A4tNN~CSOTA STATE BAI~ ASSOCIATION <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />'1 <br /> <br /> <br />