10/05/93 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF CHESTNUT RIDGE; CASE OF JOHN PETERSON, GOOD VALUE HOMES By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik Background: As you may recall, in July of this year the Commission reviewed a sketch plan for Chestnut Ridge that consisted of 58 single family lots. At that time, the sketch plan was tabled until the alignment of Sunfish Lake Drive was resolved with the City and DNR. Subsequently, John Peterson scaled back Chestnut Ridge to exclude development of that area impacted by Sunfish Lake Drive. At this time, preliminary plat approval is being sought for 12 single family lots to be situated on the extension of Krypton Street from Wood Pond Hills to the east. The balance of the property is designated as Ouflot A for future development. The following items are enclosed for your information: a) b) c) d) e) Site location map Proposed preliminary plat Proposed grading plan Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated July 6, 1993 City Staff review letter dated Septemberl0, 1993 I I I I I I I I Observations: On June 7, 1993, the City of Ramsey received an application from Good Value Homes for sketch plan review of Chestnut Ridge which consists of 35 acres tobe subdivided into 58 single family lots. On July 6, 1993, the Planning Commission tabled sketch plan review of Chestnut Ridge until the alignment of the extension of Sunfish Lake Drive N.W. was resolved with DNR. On August 30, 1993, the City of Ramsey received an application for preliminary plat approval of Chestnut Ridge that was scaled back from the original version to exclude that area potentially impaced by the extension of Sunfish Lake Drive N.W. The public hearing for consideration of the preliminary plat was scheduled for October 5, 1993. The plat now consists of 12 single family lots, all of which meet the minimum area and dimension requirements for the Shoreland Overlay District. The balance of the property is designated as Ouflot A for future development. Lots 1 through 4 and Lots 9 through 12 are proposed to receivepublic access from Kr~ton Street N.W. Lots 5 through 9 are proposed to receive access'from a private driveway extending off the end of the Krypston Street cul-de-sac, similar to the method used in Chestnut Hill. It is the City Engineer's position that the use of private drives should be limited to situations where there is no other feasible way to service a parcel. In this case, there .is sufficient developable area to accormnodate development of a public road to City standards by sacrificing one lot. The developer is proposing to install the streets, sewer and water as a private development project with no financial participation on the part of the City.