My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/08/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/08/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
4/9/2004 8:36:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
04/08/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt indicated from that point of view, as mentioned, there .are si~m-iificant wetlands. <br />He stated it seems laid out to maximize them, and without drainage and =m'ading it is hard to tell <br />if ail the lots will be able to be built, but he does not have a problem with single-family homes if <br />MUSA is extended. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the MUSA expansion is separate.· <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon stated it is a separate action. He <br />indicated this is only the Comprehensive Plan amendment, but if they do not approve MUSA, the <br />developer cannot proceed. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nix1 questioned why they would only do it for 23 acres if they were going to do an <br />extension. He believes they should plan Where they want utilities to go. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy agreed, saying if they are going to reconsider MUSA lines'they need to <br />look at it as one large action. <br /> <br />Christine Johnson, 15351 Xenia indicated she is an existing'home that was not 6ontacted about <br />the developer's plans. She is riot looking for,card to this development, noting it would be in her <br />backyard. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Brauer to recommend the City Council <br />deny the proposed sketch plan based on the need for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and <br />additional IYUSA. <br /> <br />Motion carfled. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Brauer, Jeffrey, Shepherd, Van <br />Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon noted at preliminary plat and MUSA <br />action it will be a public hearing, and people.notified. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of' Town Center 2~d Addition; Case of <br />Ramsey Town Center, LLC and D.R. I-Iorton Homes <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated this is a sketch plan review of <br />Ramsey Town Center 2"a Addition, which includes 7.96 acres. He stated-the sketch plan shows ' <br />74 town_homes in 14 separate buildings, and 22 condomirfiums located in three buildings. He <br />stated the subject property iS currently zoned Town Center-4b Neighborhood Disrr/ct. The TC- <br />4b Disir/ct allows for residential uses at'a net density of up to 15 urfits per acre, and the sketch <br />plan shows a net density of 12.1 units per acre. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon advised Staff has reviewed the plan and <br />noted several area of concern. He indicated one area is public and private streets. StaX"has some <br /> <br />Planning Commission/December 4, 2003 <br /> Page 5of 20 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.