Laserfiche WebLink
The total square footage of the existing and proposed structures is within the 35% lot coverage <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Following City Code to the letter, the existing and proposed uses should be providing as many as <br />60 off-street parking spaces when all phases of the development are complete. Subsequent to <br />receiving the City Staff review letter, the applicant modified the site plan and increased the number <br />of off-street parking spaces shown from 19 to 37. The 37 parking spaces are exclusive of that <br />secured parking area that will also provide necessary parking for the customers of the auto repair <br />and auto body shops. The Planning Commission and City Staff recommend approval of the site <br />plan with the number of parking spaces as shown. <br /> <br />The site is currently served by two accesses onto Highway #10. It is the City Engineer's <br />recommendation that these two accesses be merged into one as part of the City's goal to reduce the <br />number of accesses onto the highway. The Planning Commission recommended retaining the 2 <br />access as they currently exist. <br /> <br />Each of the proposed phases will include the installation of pavement and concrete curbing as <br />required by City Code. However, the applicant has expended a great deal of expense into the <br />property to date and has stated that because of limited funds, pavement of the secured parking area <br />is not feasible. The Planning Commission recommendation is that this area be approved for a <br />Class V surface if the applicant doesn't obtain some economic de.~velopment assistance from the <br />City or any other agency to help with the cost of paving the secured parking area. City Staff's <br />recommendation is that the City continue to agressively pursue standard site improvements on <br />commercial property and work with the applicant to achieve paving the secured parking area within <br />the time frame of the 3-phased development rather than in the 1st phase where it would have <br />normally been required. Additionally, the Planning Commission recommended that bituminous <br />curbing be allowed in this secured parking area, if it is paved. As you know, one of the <br />advantages of concrete curbing is that it strengthens the pavement edge. This secured parking area <br />is proposed to be fenced. The fencing will prevent vehicles from driving over the pavement edge <br />and thereby deteriorating it. <br /> <br />Because this is a phased development plan, the applicant is requesting a 2 year time frame, versus <br />the standard 1 year, to complete the required improvements. <br /> <br />In accordance with City Staffs review letter, the site plan has been modified to indicate the location <br />of these services to support that expansion will not impact these utilities. As with past policy, the <br />development permit will be drafted to obligate the property owner to participate in a petition, if and <br />when it is presented, for a feasibility study to extend municipal utilities to the property. <br /> <br />The only landscaping proposed is along the south end of the proposed body shop delivery/estimate <br />center and between the existing strip center and its Phase II expansion area. The types of plantings <br />to be established have not been indicated on the site plan. <br /> <br />The exterior facing on the walls of the strip center that are highly visible from Hwy. #10 has <br />recently been replaced with stucco. All other walls are painted cement block. The expansions to <br />the strip center will also consist of a combination of cement block and stucco. The auto body <br />accessory building is proposed to be faced with standard lap siding. This is in conformance with <br />City Code. <br /> <br />Staff is requesting that upon the request of the City Engineer, a grading plan be provided to avoid <br />'bird baths' in the pavement. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />