Laserfiche WebLink
September 8, 1988. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto recommended granting preliminary plat approval contingent upon <br />items in the City Engineer's report being addressed and variances being <br />granted as necessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson noted that the more acceptable urban street size width is 60 <br />feet; rather than apply for a variance, he will change the street width to <br />66 feet. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to <br />table action on Mr. Carson's preliminary plat of Windemere Woods until the <br />Park and Recreation Commission has made their recommendation regarding park <br />dedication. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mr. Bob Schwartz - 5600 142nd Avenue - Stated that the <br />residents of his neighborhood are concerned with the sewer trunk being <br />extended to serve Windemere Woods is being installed along 142nd; these <br />concerns were expressed in a petition submitted to Planning and Zoning at a <br />previous meeting. Mr. Carson stated that the City Engineers determine the <br />alignment of utilities. Chairman Zimmerman noted that City Council will <br />make the final decision as to the routing of services; that the City cannot <br />deny Windemere Woods because the area is zoned for urban type development. <br />Mr. Carson requested input from the Commission regarding developing the <br />plat with riparian or non-riparian lots. The Commission recommended <br />proceeding with non-riparian lots and obtaining a variance to lot square <br />footage. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman. Zimmerman, Commissioners Hendriksen, <br />LaDue, Holm and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Shumway <br />and Howell. <br /> <br />Case #11:. Request For Concept Review Of Development Plan; Case.Of <br /> North Fork. Inc.: <br /> <br />Mr. Dennis Peck provided the Commission with the most recent version of a <br />concept for development of the remainder of Northfork PUD which includes an <br />18 hole golf course. <br /> <br />Case #15: Discussion Re~ardin~ HY-10 4th Addition;. Case Of Mr. Art <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio recalled that on August 18~ 1988, the Commission recommended <br />preliminary plat approval of HY-10 4th Addition with extension of Ferret <br />Street to the northern boundary and no direct access onto Cty. Rd. #83. <br />Mr, Raudio presented documentation fr~n 1986 when HY-10 was platted which <br />indicated that the City had intentions to relocate Cry. Road #116 to the <br />south and eventually intersect with HY-10 on the northern boundary. Mr. <br />Raudio noted that extension of Ferret would not coincide with those plans <br />for Cry. Road #116. Mr. Raudio also presented a letter from Anoka County <br />dated June 12, 1987 which indicatd that the County would allow one access <br />onto Cry. Rd. #83 per 400 feet frontage. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission/September 14, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />