My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/28/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 04/28/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:03:54 PM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:19:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/28/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
651
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.04 Review Landscape and Storm Water Management Plan Associated with a Site Plan <br />Application for Sunwood Village: Case of Common Bond <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. <br />Chairperson Stodola asked if they would be sharing the ramp. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that the access points will be shared. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that there is on-site parking. <br />Board Member Lewis inquired if it was all surface parking. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill responded affirmatively. <br />Chairperson Stodola asked if there is enough parking. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the type of floor plan and income levels <br />were considered. This project would likely be more one car households so it would meet the <br />minimum of one stall per unit. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that there is visitor parking a half a block away that is not overnight <br />parking for guests. <br />Board Member Lewis commented that this plan was well thought out and robust and that he was <br />impressed. He doesn't have a problem with it and felt that it was more innovative and detailed <br />than the previous proposal. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that this project did receive $580,000 in funding <br />from the Metropolitan Council. <br />Board Member Lewis stated that this is the kind of project and plan that should be looked at for <br />the Eco Star Award. <br />City Council Liaison LeTourneau spoke to the Staff regarding the contrast between the two cases <br />and how the Board is appreciative of complete picture. He asked how likely is it that the Board <br />can ask developers to provide more complete plans in the future. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that this is something the Staff strives to <br />achieve. He spoke about project deadlines and said that historically the City has tried to give some <br />contingent recommendations and revisit them. If the Board feels that the information in the last <br />case was not enough, then Staff should know and then they can go back to the developer. He <br />stated that if it is the Board's wish to have the kind of detail found in this project, Staff will make <br />sure they provide it without delaying projects. Staff can work with code to provide the desired <br />level of detail. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.