Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 3. Resolution #14-07-136 Adopting Findings of Fact #0931 Related to a Request for <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Plat <br /> 4. Resolution #14-07-137 Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment <br />and Preliminary Plat <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Levine called the public hearing to order at 7:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill presented the staff report stating the purpose of this case was to <br />consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Plat approval for a seven <br />(7) lot single family subdivision that is immediately adjacent to Rivlyn Avenue that will extend an existing cul- <br />de-sac. The site is located on the easternmost border of the City, adjacent to the City of Anoka. The purpose <br />of the Preliminary Plat is to provide approval of the layout and configuration of the Plat. The Planning <br />Commission should consider Preliminary Plat approval to be approval of the plat itself, with the Final Plat <br />approving a document for recording as well as approving the final construction plans to achieve the approved <br />layout. The Final Plat is not reviewed by the Planning Commission. A video from MnDOT on the plans for <br />Highway 10 was viewed. He requested the Commission consider how the proposed plat fits in with the <br />Highway 10 Access Study. Staff reviewed the proposal in further detail and questioned how the Commission <br />wanted to proceed with the subdivision. It was noted the request was under the 60 day review. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Chairperson Levine supported this case be postponed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauer was in favor of holding off as well until the service road location has been determined. <br />He stated it would make the most sense for the service road to have the southern route. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer recommended the public hearing be recessed. He suggested the Commission not make <br />a decision on this matter until the MnDOT study was completed. He did not want the Planning Commission <br />to have to deny the request because it did not have enough information. Development Services Manager <br />Gladhill explained the public hearing could be postponed, but suggested comments be taken this evening. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nosan questioned where the trail would be located. Development Services Manager Gladhill <br />reviewed the proposed trail location on the current plans with the Commission. He indicated the Parks <br />Commission supported the reconfiguration of the trail. He commented that the trail location can be <br />approved by the Park Commission prior to this item moving forward. <br /> <br />Randy Deers, representative from Village Bank, explained the subject property has been for sale for the past <br />two years and there has been no interest. After discussing the property with a developer, the plan before the <br />Commission was designed. He indicated the proposed plat would give the seven property owners access to <br />the river. He stated Village Bank would prefer the northern route for the frontage road as it would impact <br />the homeowners less. He believed the plan would benefit the City. <br /> <br />Chairperson Levine questioned how the Commission should move forward. Development Services Manager <br />Gladhill suggested the Commission close the public hearing and begin discussing each item requested from <br />Village Bank. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />