Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported a policy direction was provided by the Council on this <br />matter that the southerly route should be removed consideration. A final determination on this matter could <br />not be made until further discussions were held with the City of Anoka. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauer questioned how the City would proceed if Anoka requested the frontage route be <br />removed from consideration. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated Ramsey had the ability to make land use decisions within <br />its borders and did not have to wait until the Highway 10 study was complete. He reported the City would <br />continue to work with Lano Equipment, Inc. to address their concerns. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nosan supported the major subdivision request from the Village Bank and hoped that the <br />frontage road would be pursued by the City. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to recommend adopting Resolution <br />#14-07-134 adopting Findings of Fact #0930 related to the request for a Variance to Maximum Cul-de-Sac <br />length. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Nosan, and Bauer. Voting No: <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Brauer and Maul. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to recommend adopting Resolution <br />#14-07-135 approving a Variance to Maximum Cul-de-Sac length. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Nosan, and Bauer. Voting No: <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Brauer and Maul. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to recommend that City Council <br />adopt Resolution #14-07-136 approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, and <br />Preliminary Plat for Ridgepointe, contingent upon Compliance with the Staff Review File dated July 3, 2014 <br />and the following: <br /> <br />1. Execution of a Development Agreement with the City. <br />2. Approval of a Letter of Map Revision related to Flood Plain Boundaries. <br />3. Elimination of Highway 10 Access Planning Study Tungsten Street Area Local Road Connection <br />Alternative #2 (Backage Road). <br />4. Final Agreement with the City of Anoka on the placement of the roadway. <br /> <br />Further discussion <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauer asked if the applicant would have to wait to develop the property until the City of <br />Anoka approved the roadway placement. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated the City would have to work through the Highway 10 <br />Access Study to resolve these concerns. He believed that Council could grant contingent approval. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Nosan, and Bauer. Voting No: <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Brauer and Maul. <br /> <br />City Council: August 26, 2014 <br /> <br />7.02: Consider Approvals Related to Ridgepoint, a Major Subdivision; Case of Village Bank <br /> <br /> <br />