Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the staff report noting this case was previously <br />discussed on April 10th and was postponed on July 10, 2014 to the August 7th meeting in order to receive <br />additional direction from the City Council regarding the implications of the Highway 10 Access Planning <br />Study. On July 22, 2014, the Council adopted Resolution #14-07-147 officially requesting removal of the <br />of Anoka whom is also impacted by the future local road connection. It was noted on July 29, 2014, staff <br />Planning Study was still not complete. Staff provided further comment on request and he was comfortable <br />with the Planning Commission approving the applicants request with contingencies. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauer questioned what the issues were with the frontage road. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported the frontage road scenario creates a loop in the road in <br />order for the road to properly align with Highway 10, which would mean the loss of developable commercial <br />property in Anoka. He stated this matter was still being discussed by staff and had yet to be reviewed by the <br />Anoka City Council. He explained that the road may be pushed to the east to reduce or eliminate the need <br />for the loop. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauer asked if the Anoka approved of the frontage road. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained that the contingent plans had been reviewed by staff <br />but that nothing had been approved by Anoka Council or staff. <br /> <br />Randy Diehrs, 2344 Inland Drive North in Blaine, thanked staff for continuing to work on his request. He <br />believed that the frontage road was appropriate and would allow for the creation of seven buildable lots. In <br />addition, the frontage road would keep the Highway 10 traffic away from the residential lots. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners VanScoy, Nosan, and Bauer. Voting No: <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Brauer and Maul. <br /> <br />Chairperson Levine closed the public hearing closed at 9:08 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy supported the request with the contingencies recommended by staff. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauer was uncomfortable taking the southern route off the table entirely. He would like to <br />receive additional feedback from neighboring business and property owners. He explained the report <br />presented by staff would eliminate the southerly route. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy believed that the Council recommended the southerly route be removed from <br />consideration. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />