Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 07/28/2015 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Update on Consulting Land Use Planning and Zoning Administration Services Utilized by the City and Review <br />New Quotes from Qualified Firms <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to update the City Council on a recent change to professional services utilized by the <br />Community Development Department. The City's previous project manager from the existing firm the City had <br />been utilizing has accepted a position with another organization, leaving a service level gap in the City's <br />Community Development Department. Staff has sought quotes from qualified firms and received two (2) responses. <br />City Staff would like to confirm with the City Council the selection of the firm WSB & Associates to provide <br />as -needed support to the City's Community Development Department. <br />The Community Development Department budgets $20,000 annually for professional services. These services <br />include, but are not necessarily limited to, policy review, ordinance drafting, and permit review. In addition, the <br />City utilizes these services to aide in the review of land use applications such as Major Subdivisions and significant <br />Site Plan Reviews. Costs incurred by Land Use Applications are passed on to the Applicant. Utilizing professional <br />services, either for direct application review or to supplement other activities to allow City Staff to review, has been <br />an effective tool that allows the City to respond to the variable nature in activity levels. Additionally, with the <br />priority placed on clarifying the vision of The COR at the request of the Planning Commission, Staff finds it <br />necessary to select a firm as soon as possible to balance key priorities and current activity levels. Note: Staff finds <br />this assistance necessary, even if the Planning Commission had not initiated the exercise to compare the previous <br />vision of The COR. General categories of assistance include, but are not limited to the following. <br />Utilizing professional services allows the City to address activity levels that exceed the capacity of current Staffing <br />levels that 1) acknowledges the variability in activity levels and only call on when needed; and 2) acknowledges <br />when consistent activity levels do not warrant the hiring of a full-time or part-time employee. <br />The City's Professional Services Policy states that a Request for Proposal must be used if the amount exceeds <br />$40,000. In this case, the City only budgets $20,000. This amount, plus amounts paid for by Applicants for Land <br />Use Applications, remains below this dollar figure. Staff would like to confirm consensus of the City Council the <br />proposed plan to select a firm based on obtained quotes. <br />City Staff requested quotes from three (3) firms; HKGi, SRF, and WSB. HKGi and WSB submitted quotes for <br />consideration. SRF elected not to respond, as this firm is more focused on project -specific planning assistance as <br />opposed go general, day-to-day planning assistance. The quotes from HKGi and WSB are generally comparable. <br />Staff believes that the WSB quote provides the most flexibility in managing costs with a low-end hourly rate of $72 <br />to a high end rate of $114. Staff believes the project team selected by WSB and associated hourly rates matches the <br />need and the City's rates and charges for land use applications well. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1 - Select WSB to provide as -needed support to the Community Development. The City has used this <br />approach with a different firm for several years with good success in managing workload and costs. Staff <br />recommends that the City continue to utilize this option. <br />Alternative 2 - Hire a regular City employee in lieu of professional services. The City has not budgeted for a <br />