My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/25/1982 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1982
>
Minutes - Council - 10/25/1982 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:26:29 PM
Creation date
4/15/2004 3:20:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
10/25/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In the discussion that followed, the following points were made: <br /> <br />When you incinerate, you end up with 5-10% of total volume in ash. <br /> <br />As far as trucking hazardous waste is concerned, part of licensing involves <br />trained driver and having equipment on board to handle spills. <br /> <br />The Waste Management Board is looking for areas with good access and some <br />industrial development for hazardous waste sites. They have come up with <br />28 areas that are reasonable for further study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann stated that the Board must have overlooked the access <br />factor when they considered Ramsey as a site for further study. He also <br />stated that the Metro area should be considered because they have the best <br />transportation facilities and generate the most hazardous waste. <br /> <br />Sharon Decker stated that the Board is looking at many areas in the course <br />metro area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann stated that the farther you transfer hazardous wastes, <br />the more apt you are to dump or spill before reaching destination. For <br />instance, the transfer station located in Arizona, how much waste is dumped <br />in the desert before it reaches the final processing site in California? <br /> <br />Sharon Decker explained that a manifest process has been developed to <br />control comings and goings of loads. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann stated that Council's concern is that Ramsey has a <br />landfill with problems and the City does not need more problems. He further <br />stated that he is against having a collection point in Ramsey unless there <br />are some very definite pluses for the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the City is getting more information from the Waste <br />Management Board on this issue than it did on the landfill matter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Van Wagner asked how the Waste Management Board is connected <br />with the Metro Council. <br /> <br />Kathy Moore explained that Waste Management and Metro Council are both State <br />agencies, but the Metro Council deals more with counties. She further <br />stated that the Waste Management and Metro Council are in contact with each <br />other for an exchange of information, but the Metro Council is not involved <br />in siting process for waste management facilities. <br /> <br />Council recessed at 8:59 P.M. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the special meeting back to order at 9:13 P.M. <br /> <br />Mr. Reiner stated that the types of plants that would be located in Minnesota <br />would not be able to take care of nuclear wastes. At this point, any wastes <br />that could not be handled, would still have to be shipped out of State. <br /> <br />Sharon Decker explained that there is not an overwhelming interest, on the <br />part of firms, to locate in Minnesota because the market is not that large. <br />Companies are impressed that the State of Minnesota is taking an active lead <br />though. Waste Management would like to see a facility in Minnesota because <br /> <br />'Sp C/October 25, 1982 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.