My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/28/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 07/28/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:06:31 PM
Creation date
8/18/2015 9:54:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/28/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Figure 26. Correlation of monthly water bills to residential per capita water use. <br />Residential G C C� <br />Residential Per Capita Use versos Monthly Bill <br />160 <br />140 <br />1190it •+1." * } 4 <br />+ <br />0 # + - - - <br />$ , • �-.-,_. <br />■ 4 <br />1 • + IP <br />0 <br />Fquhr.elem %i+mtth[y BI M <br />Infrastructure costs are one of the biggest hurdles to expanding the use of surface water and <br />reclaimed wastewater in the region. Water treatment requirements for surface water are usually higher <br />than for groundwater, and most water users are located considerable distance from surface water and <br />reclaimed wastewater sources. Even where the treatment costs are similar between groundwater and <br />surface water, it is usually more financially feasible to gradually expand a groundwater supply system <br />than to secure the up -front costs to construct a complete surface water system. <br />There are currently only two surface water treatment plants in the region, operated by Minneapolis <br />Water Works and Saint Paul Regional Water Services. Investing in additional surface water treatment <br />plants is a large cost. The capital cost of a new surface water treatment plant to serve select <br />communities in the north and east metropolitan area was estimated to be $44-291 million dollars. <br />Operations and maintenance costs for such a system are estimated to be $4-9 million per year, <br />proportioned based on relevant Saint Paul Regional Water Services costs. Distribution costs are <br />equally challenging. For example, an assessment of the costs and benefits of using the St. Croix River <br />to augment White Bear Lake highlights the high costs of installing forcemain and the energy needed to <br />pump water from the river valley up to potential users (Metropolitan Council, 2014b). In 2015, the cost <br />to construct a 50 million gallon per day treatment plant along the Minnesota River was estimated to be <br />$150 million (Metropolitan Council, 2015b). <br />Costs to collect and store large amounts of stormwater can also be costly. For example, work in <br />Dakota County suggests that capital costs for stormwater capture and use systems for over 500,000 <br />gallons is approximately $150,000-1,500,000 depending on the use of stormwater ponds versus <br />underground storage systems (Metropolitan Council, 2015b). <br />Key factors contributing to uncertainty <br />This chapter provides a regional screening of some key water supply issues. The information <br />presented here can be used in local water supply planning and technical analyses, if work is not <br />already underway. <br />WATER SUPPLY MASTER <br />PLAN- Draft June 2015 <br />55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.